Alec Baldwin is embroiled in a legal battle that could see him face up to 18 months in prison if convicted of involuntary manslaughter.
The charges stem from a tragic incident on the set of the Western film "Rust," where a gun Baldwin was handling discharged, resulting in the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins and injury to director Joel Souza. Legal experts have suggested that Baldwin's volatile temperament could potentially undermine his defense, but the destruction of key evidence might tip the scales in his favor.
According to Fox News Digital, Todd Spodek, a lawyer who previously represented a woman convicted of stalking Baldwin, warned that the actor's emotional volatility could be detrimental to his case. "Its incredibly risky if he testifies," Spodek cautioned. "Hes always having outbursts. Hes someone who isnt in control of his emotions and is extremely volatile." Spodek's experience with Baldwin during a previous trial revealed the actor's propensity to react strongly when provoked, a trait that could be perceived by jurors as recklessness and impulsivity.
Defense attorney Mark Bederow concurred with Spodek's assessment, adding that Baldwin's inconsistent accounts of the incident to the media and police could be exploited by prosecutors. "He is in New Mexico, which is a long way from Hollywood and New York," Bederow observed. "There is a real risk that a New Mexico jury may find him insincere and insufferable."
Baldwin has maintained that the gun fired accidentally, insisting that he cocked the weapon's hammer but did not pull the trigger. Prosecutors, however, have argued that the pistol could not have discharged without Baldwin firing a round. The defense's case has been complicated by the fact that the FBI destroyed the gun, a Colt .45, during testing, making it impossible to verify potential defects that could have caused a malfunction.
Bederow suggested that the prosecution's destruction of the gun could be a significant advantage for the defense. "The prosecutions destruction of the gun could be extremely helpful to the defense," he stated. "It's never a good look for the prosecution to be so reckless when that is precisely what they are accusing the defendant of being."
The gun was damaged during testing when investigators struck it with a mallet from various angles, breaking its firing and safety mechanisms. Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer, who declined to dismiss the case last month, has allowed both sides to explore the issue of how the gun was damaged during the trial.
Elizabeth Bunker, a New Mexico-based attorney, suggested that the defense's argument might not convince jurors familiar with firearms. "A crowd that knows firearms will say, Of course you pulled the trigger, youre full of it!" she remarked.
The film's armorer, Hannah Gutierrez Reed, is currently serving an 18-month sentence after being convicted of the same charge Baldwin is facing. Her conviction was based on the jury's finding that she was reckless in placing a live round in the gun Baldwin fired. Bederow anticipates that Baldwin's defense will argue that Gutierrez Reed was responsible for ensuring the firearm's safety and that her conviction will bolster his case.
The defense's argument could be further strengthened by Screen Actors Guild (SAG) rules, which delineate the responsibilities of various roles on a film set. Prosecutors contend that Baldwin should have checked that the gun was not loaded, but according to Los Angeles-based entertainment attorney Tre Lovell, SAG protocols indicate otherwise. "But on a movie set its different and everyone has a job and duty. The actors act, the directors direct, the gaffers do the onset stuff and armorers are there as weapons experts," Lovell explained.
However, Baldwin's role as a producer on the film could potentially be a point of vulnerability. Despite this, Judge Sommer ruled during a pretrial hearing that prosecutors cannot introduce evidence of Baldwin's status as a producer. The trial promises to be a complex and contentious affair, with the defense and prosecution each seeking to leverage the available evidence and legal arguments to their advantage.
Login