As the Iranian regime faces devastating military pressure abroad and growing unrest at home, its rulers have turned to an unlikely new tactic: a clumsy propaganda appeal aimed directly at American Democrat voters in the run-up to the 2026 midterm elections.
According to RedState, the mullahs in Tehran have issued an open letter that reads less like sober diplomacy and more like a mash-up of campus radicalism, fringe leftist talking points, and the kind of Trump-deranged rhetoric that has dominated progressive media for nearly a decade. The document suggests that, in the eyes of Irans rulers, one of their most promising political instruments in the West may no longer be Hezbollah or other terror proxies, but the American Left itselfspecifically, those voters conditioned to view Donald Trump as the embodiment of evil and to sympathize reflexively with any force aligned against him.
To understand why Tehran would attempt such an outreach, one must recall the nature of the regime making this pitch. Since the Islamist revolution of 1979, Irans theocrats have presided over a reign of terror that includes the stoning of women, the persecution and execution of homosexuals, the murder of political dissidents and non-believers, and the systematic export of terrorism across the Middle East and beyond. For nearly half a century, the Iranian people have endured a suffocating combination of religious tyranny, economic mismanagement, and brutal repression, even as their rulers pour resources into proxy wars and nuclear ambitions.
Against that backdrop, the regimes sudden posture of solidarity with American votersspecifically, disaffected Democratsis as cynical as it is revealing. Tehrans propagandists appear to have calculated that a significant portion of the Democrat base, conditioned by years of relentless anti-Trump messaging, will instinctively sympathize with any entity cast as Trumps enemy, even if that entity is a regime that stones women and funds terror. The letter is thus tailored to exploit emotional vulnerability and partisan grievance, not to engage in honest debate or diplomacy.
The core of the Iranian message is an attempt to forge a bond over shared victimhood, casting both Iranians and Americans as oppressed by the same sinister power structure in Washington. The nations of Iran and America are both, each in their own way, victims of the oppression of the occupants of the White Housewhich should, if names were to reflect reality, aptly be named the House of Oppression. The root of the pain the two nations share is that the evil occupants of the White House, who come to power in elections that are dominated by misleading propaganda campaigns, do not truly represent the American people. They only represent the interests of an elite cohort of powerful Zionist capitalists. To win over this cohort, American leaders violate not only the rights of other nations but also those of the American people, and they consistently place the interests of this small but powerful cohort above the interests of their own people.
The letter continues this theme by insisting that Americans are as abused by their leaders as any foreign population. The injustice that the occupants of the White House subject the American people to is no less than that to which they subject other nations. In fact, one could argue that in some respects the injustice that Americans are made to suffer by their leaders is even greater. This is classic agitprop: a foreign authoritarian regime attempting to drive a wedge between a free people and their own elected government by amplifying domestic grievances and recasting them as proof of systemic illegitimacy.
What makes this effort particularly striking is how closely it mirrors the rhetoric of the American Left. The letter leans heavily on the same narratives of systemic oppression, oligarchic control, and Zionist influence that animate the more radical corners of progressive politics and academia. It is no coincidence that the document reads like it could have been drafted by a keffiyeh-clad graduate student at an Ivy League campus protest, or by a left-wing activist group railing against American imperialism and capitalist exploitation.
The regimes propagandists also deploy familiar statistics and talking points that have long circulated in progressive circles. The United States has four percent of the worlds population but 20 percent of its prisoners. This is despite the fact that many acts considered crimes in other countries are not crimes in the United States. They add: Every year, more than 1,300 Americans are shot and killed by police in the streetsa figure that is unmatched anywhere else in the world, not even in China or India, although each has a population of about 1.5 billion. These claims are presented not as part of a good-faith discussion about criminal justice or policing, but as ammunition in a broader indictment of the American system itself.
The letter further accuses U.S. leaders of deliberately sowing division at home as a means of control. The occupants of the White House have long employed the age-old strategy of divide and conquer not only to maintain their coercive domination over other nations so as to plunder their resources but also in relation to the American people. If Americans only opened their eyes and looked around, they would visibly behold the deep divisions and factions that their rulers have created in American society. The polarization and factional anger that pervade American society today are at levels not seen since the Civil War. Again, the regime is not wrong to note polarization, but its purpose is not reconciliation or reform; it is to inflame resentment and delegitimize American self-government.
From there, the letter pivots to a familiar obsession of both Tehran and the radical Left: Israel. The occupants of the White House have for over five decades now sacrificed the interests of the American people, as well as those of all other nations, for securing the diabolical ambitions of Israel. This perverse devotion to Israel has become even more pronounced in the past decade. As the U.S. marches headlong toward the precipice of a major economic crisis, with tens of millions of Americans living below the poverty line and the overwhelming portion of the national wealth accumulated at the top one percent of the population, the government is providing billions of dollars every year in grants paid by hardworking American taxpayers to Israel to fund its ravenous, genocidal military.
The regime then folds standard anti-war and anti-defense rhetoric into its narrative of American decline. By imposing ungodly levels of taxes on Americans in order to finance the trillions of dollars needed for the endless wars the military-industrial complex ignites in regions thousands of miles away, U.S. leaders exacerbate their countrys inflation, unemployment, and poverty and cause the deaths of American servicemembers while inflicting death and devastation on the people of other nations. There is a kernel of truth in the critique of overextension abroad, but coming from a regime that bankrolls terror militias, foments regional chaos, and has American blood on its hands in Iraq and elsewhere, the moral posturing is nothing short of grotesque.
What the letter carefully omits is Irans own record as a destabilizing force and serial aggressor. For decades, the Islamic Republic has armed and funded terrorist organizations from Hezbollah in Lebanon to militias in Iraq and Syria, all while pursuing nuclear capabilities that would dramatically raise the stakes of its death to America and death to Israel rhetoric. When a regime openly threatens to annihilate a neighboring state and routinely calls for the downfall of the United States, its acquisition of nuclear weapons is not a theoretical concern; it is an existential one.
Perhaps the most audacious portion of the document is its attempt to clarify the meaning of the regimes infamous chant. In light of what has been said, it should be fairly obvious that the phrase Death to America, which Iranians have been chanting since the triumph of the Islamic Revolution, does not in any way express any ill will toward the American people, who have themselves suffered from the same oppression. Death to America is a prayer for the eradication of the diabolical ruling elite whose seat of power is the White House. It is a cry born of the pain of oppression.
The letter then poses a rhetorical question meant to justify this slogan. Do the oppressed not have the right to wish death upon the evil oppressors responsible for killing their brothers, sisters, parents, and children, for plundering their natural resources, and for denigrating their millennia-old cultural heritage? It concludes this line of argument by insisting that the same men enthroned in Washington oppress both nations. The men enthroned at the White House oppress both Iranians and Americans. The difference between the two nations is that, as Iranians, we have made up our mind to free ourselves from their oppression, and we are prepared to make the necessary sacrifices, because Islam requires believers to stand up to tyrants who only understand the language of power, whose first inclination is to bully and humiliate those weaker than them, and whofor all their disingenuous talk of human rights and human dignityare more than willing to resort to oppression, repression, and ethnic, racial, and financial discrimination.
This framing is not accidental; it is designed to resonate with an American Left that has spent years insisting that Donald Trump is not merely a political opponent but an illegitimate tyrant. The same Democrat Party that never fully accepted Trumps 2016 victorypursuing multiple impeachment efforts, floating the 25th Amendment, and cheering on lawfare aimed at jailing himhas primed a segment of its base to view the presidency itself as a vehicle of oppression when held by someone they despise. Into that environment steps Tehran, offering a narrative in which Trump and his successors are not elected leaders but evil occupants of a House of Oppression serving Zionist capitalists.
From a conservative perspective, the danger here is not that Irans letter will single-handedly swing an election; there is, as the original commentary noted, not a snowballs chance in Bushehr that this propaganda will meaningfully shift the American electorate. The real concern is what the episode reveals about the ideological convergence between radical elements of the Democrat coalition and an Islamist regime that chants Death to America. When Tehrans talking points on Israel, American policing, economic inequality, and imperialism sound indistinguishable from those heard on elite campuses and in certain progressive circles, it underscores how far the Lefts discourse has drifted from traditional American patriotism.
For those who still believe in limited government, national sovereignty, and a strong but prudent foreign policy, this episode is a reminder of the stakes. A free society cannot afford to indulge narratives that cast its own institutions as irredeemably evil while excusing or even romanticizing regimes that jail dissidents, hang homosexuals, and stone women. Nor can it ignore the fact that Americas most implacable enemies are now openly courting one of its major political parties voters by echoing that partys most radical rhetoric.
The Iranian regimes open letter will likely be forgotten by most voters long before ballots are cast in 2026, but its contents should not be dismissed. It offers a candid look at how Americas adversaries perceive our internal divisions and how eager they are to exploit them, particularly by appealing to those on the Left who already view their own country as the primary source of injustice in the world. For conservatives, it is yet another argument for restoring a politics grounded in national pride, moral clarity, and a sober recognition of who our friends areand who, beyond any doubt, are not.
Login