Gavin Newsom addressing a climate change conference is a spectacle that almost writes its own satire.
The California governor, long treated by coastal elites as a future presidential contender, took the stage at a recent climate gathering to a dwindling audience of true believers in a movement that, as reported by Conservative Daily News, lost its steam decades ago. According to the outlet, Newsoms appearance underscored the disconnect between progressive political theater and the real-world consequences of his governance, particularly in a state that has seen an exodus of taxpayers, businesses, and families fleeing high costs, crime, and regulatory overreach.
Newsom undeniably looks the part of a modern media-era presidentyoung, tall, handsome, cut off the cover of GQ, energetic, and charismatic. Yet critics argue that once the glossy exterior and crossed legs and effeminate hand gestures are stripped away, there is little substance left, beyond a carefully curated image and a relentless ambition.
The governors detractors describe him as a black belt narcissist who has taken the Golden State of California, the crown jewel of the West, and turned it into a fraud-ridden cesspool of bad policies, worse decisions. They contend that his agenda has forced most able-bodied, tax-paying, level-headed businesses and people to leave the state for new homes in Texas, Florida, and Tennessee, where lower taxes, lighter regulation, and stronger public order offer a stark contrast to Californias decline.
In this telling, the real winners of the Newsom era are not working families or small businesses but moving companies, as the biggest beneficiaries of Gavin Newsoms time in Frisco and Sacramento are Pods and U-Haul. For those alarmed by his record, there is no reason on earth that this man should be given the reins for this country and a seat behind the Resolute Desk, with some suggesting he deserves only a final goodbye party at The French Laundry hosted by his creator, Nancy Pelosi, and close the book on both of these America haters.
At the climate conference itself, Newsom sat at the dais in the center of the stage, talking to the remaining fans of Al Gore and Greta Thunberg, not so much about alternative energy and the danger of carbon fuels, because most of those claims have been debunked. Instead, he used the platform to vilify Donald Trump with such outrageous claims that he should have been interrupted by the moderator, who was just bobbing his head to the rhythm of Newsoms flailing arms.
The moderator probably wasnt even listening, and except for the fact that FOX News covered the event, hopefully not many people heard Newsoms dribble. Newsoms remarks coincided with Trumps address to the UN General Assembly, a juxtaposition that highlighted the contrast between a president focused on national sovereignty and strength, and a governor leaning into progressive orthodoxy and personal attacks.
Critics argue that if FOX did not give airtime to foolish events like the Climate Change Conference, nobody would be harmed or disappointed. In their view, the media oxygen granted to useless and dangerous entities, like Hassan Piker, only prolongs their influence, and the remedy is simple: stop giving these useless and dangerous entitiesair to breathe, and they will eventually die on their own.
The climate conference was not the only display of progressive ambition on that day, as coincidentally, these two events were happening at the same time: JB Pritzker held his weigh-in for the media on the banks of Lake Michigan to claim he had shed 80 pounds and was now fit to be President. Observers on the right scoff that if Pritzker had an IQ as high as his family bank balance, he would realize that he is nothing beyond his wealth.
Pritzker, alongside Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, have done as much damage to Illinois as Gavin has done to California. The situation has deteriorated so badly that even the Bears are pulling up stakes and leaving Illinois, a symbolic indictment of the states anti-business climate and urban mismanagement.
For conservatives, the prospect of a national ticket featuring Newsom, Pritzker, Kamala Harris, or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezdismissively referenced as Kamala or Sandyis a warning sign of how far the Democratic Party has drifted from common sense and constitutional restraint. In that spirit, critics insist that neither of these men, nor Kamala or Sandy either, should ever be allowed anywhere near the White House, and the only way they should be at the Capitol on January 20, 2029 is to witness President JD Vance take the Oath of Office.
Login