Federal prosecutors are moving to haul four New York Times reporters before a grand jury after they revealed that President Donald Trump briefly reverted to the older Air Force One over security concerns tied to a newly acquired presidential jet.
According to WND, the Department of Justice has notified the journalists that they are to appear before a federal grand jury in Manhattan, a move widely viewed as an effort to probe how and why they reported on alleged vulnerabilities in the refurbished aircraft recently gifted by Qatar. As reported by WND, the inquiry appears to center on the Times claim that the newer jet lacked some of the advanced security measures of the older aircraft used to transport the president, raising questions about whether sensitive national security information was disclosed.
The Hill reported that The Times reported that the refurbished jet lacked some of the advanced security measures of the older aircraft used to transport the president. The reporters include Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton, Tyler Pager and Eric Schmitt. They also wrote earlier this week that a security precaution forced Trump to depart to the NATO summit in Turkey on the old Air Force One, were called to testify next week before a federal grand jury in Manhattan in regard to an alleged violation of federal criminal law. The switch-up also raised red flags around potential threats against the president from Iran after the U.S. launched fresh strikes on the Islamic Republic earlier this week. That account underscores the stakes: the presidents safety, the integrity of U.S. military deterrence against Iran, and the governments willingness to drag journalists into criminal proceedings over their coverage.
Before the Times published its story, the FBI had already tried to stop it, urging the paper on national security grounds not to release details about the aircraft and the security-driven decision to use the older plane. The bureaus intervention, followed by the grand jury subpoenas, has fueled concerns that the Biden Justice Department is stretching national security into a catch-all justification for secrecy and pressure on the press.
The Times has denounced the investigation into alleged lawbreaking as an act of intimidation and an assault on press freedom, even as its own reporting has sometimes aligned with the national security establishment. From a conservative vantage point, the spectacle of a liberal-leaning outlet suddenly discovering the dangers of an overreaching security state only highlights how expansive federal power has become under the current administration.
David McCraw, a lawyer for the newspaper, called the governments move a shock to the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution. He added, This brazen act should be seen as nothing more than an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs.
Seth Stern of the Freedom of the Press Foundation went further, accusing the government of using national security as a pretext to shield itself from embarrassment rather than to protect the country.
Weve long said that when the government claims it needs to investigate journalists to protect national security, it really means its own reputational security, Stern asserted, echoing long-standing conservative warnings about bureaucratic self-preservation.
The Times original report, citing people briefed on the plans, said Trump left Turkey on the old Air Force One as a security precaution. They wrote, The swap deepens questions about whether the new plane, which the president had pressed to be ready as soon as possible, was retrofitted with sufficient security measures over the last year. Lawmakers and some officials have raised concerns about whether the expedited timeline allowed for the addition of an advanced missile defense system and other modifications used to protect the president.
The White House has insisted that the new jet has been fitted with appropriate security protocols, while also emphasizing that the commander in chief retains the option to use every tool at our disposal, including distraction and misdirection. At the same time, anonymous sources quoted by the Times claimed the new aircraft still does not match the older planes defensive capabilities, a discrepancy that raises obvious questions about why the administration rushed the jet into service.
Officials further argued that the older jet was used for part of the trip because the new one was scheduled to stop at military bases so it could be showcased to American troops. That explanation, juxtaposed with reports of Iranian threats and concerns over missile defense systems, leaves unresolved whether political optics and diplomatic theater were allowed to compete with the presidents security and the publics right to know.
Login