Karen Basss Victory Lap Disaster: Takes Credit For First Rebuilt House, There's Only One Problem...

Written by Published

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass recently found herself at the center of controversy after celebrating what she described as the "first rebuild" of a home in the Pacific Palisades following last year's devastating wildfires.

The announcement, however, has been met with skepticism and criticism from local residents who argue that the mayor's claims are misleading.

According to Gateway Pundit, the house in question was not a typical residence destroyed by the wildfires. Instead, it was a developer project that had been in the pipeline well before the fires occurred. This revelation has led to accusations that the city failed to verify whether the showcased property was indeed a fire-loss rebuild.

The New York Post highlighted this issue, reporting that "LA Mayor Karen Bass called out for phony Palisades rebuild after devastating wildfire." The property on Kagawa Street was purchased in November 2024, with a demolition permit secured on January 7, mere hours before the Palisades Fire reignited, destroying thousands of structures, including the original home on the site.

The project, which underwent the usual debris removal, inspections, and city reviews, received final approval in April. When the house passed its last inspection, City Hall was quick to label it as the first official rebuild.

Critics argue this declaration was premature and misleading, as the project was unrelated to the fire's destruction. The Los Angeles Times attempted to defend Mayor Bass with a tweet, but detractors have labeled this defense as "completely dishonest."

Despite the passage of more than ten months since the fires, there has been little progress in rebuilding efforts, leaving many to question the leadership of both Mayor Bass and Governor Gavin Newsom. The lack of tangible results raises concerns about the effectiveness of their administration in addressing the aftermath of such a significant disaster.

The fact that neither has faced significant political repercussions for this perceived inaction is remarkable. This situation underscores the need for accountability and transparency in government, particularly when it comes to disaster recovery and management.