'Pocohantas' Takes A FIRM Stand To Protect The Department Of EducationSee It To BELIEVE It!

Written by Published

Elizabeth Warren, the Democratic senator from Massachusetts, has pledged to probe the potential shuttering of the Department of Education, a move that has sparked controversy among conservatives and liberals alike.

Warren, a vocal critic of school choice, expressed her vehement opposition to the proposed closure in a recent interview with ABC News.

"The federal government has invested in our public schools," Warren stated. "Taking that away from our kids so that a handful of billionaires can be even richer is just plain ugly, and I will fight it with everything I've got." According to RedState, she further emphasized the power Democrats still hold despite being the minority in the House, Senate, and lacking control of the White House. "We've still got a lot we can do, and this combination of investigations, oversight, storytelling and lawsuits is that we can combine more power and push back hard, and it's already yielded some results," she added.

The Department of Education (DOE), established in 1979, was designed to elevate national education standards and guarantee equal access to quality education. However, after over four decades, the department's efficacy is under scrutiny. Critics argue that the DOE has become a bureaucratic burden, eroding local control and failing to enhance student outcomes despite significant increases in spending. They contend that dismantling the DOE could restore state and local control, minimize waste, and foster innovation in education. However, politicians like Warren seem to overlook the flaws in the current system, which is failing our students.

Education is best managed at the state and local levels, where schools can customize curricula to meet their students' needs. The DOE imposes universal mandates that often clash with local priorities. States and local school districts have a better understanding of their students' needs than distant federal bureaucrats. Federal mandates create unnecessary bureaucracy, diverting schools' focus from education to compliance. The abolition of the DOE would allow states to experiment with various models and stimulate competition, leading to innovation.

The U.S. Constitution does not assign the federal government authority over education; this power has traditionally been vested in states and local communities. The dissolution of the DOE would restore this original framework and enable states to manage their own education policies.

Despite the DOE's budget ballooning since its inception, American education has not seen significant improvement. Spending has surged from $13 billion in 1980 to over $79 billion in 2023, and the Department of Education's gross cost was approximately $252 billion in fiscal year 2024. Despite this expenditure, U.S. students lag behind their peers in many other developed nations in math, science, and reading. Graduation rates and standardized test scores have remained stagnant or even declined in many areas. The elimination of the DOE would allow taxpayer money to be used more efficiently, ensuring funds reach classrooms rather than being absorbed by federal bureaucracy.

Warren's opposition to school choice aligns with her stance against the DOE's dissolution. A federal education monopoly stifles competition and restricts school choice options for parents. If the DOE were abolished, states could expand voucher programs, charter schools, and homeschooling options without interference.

School choice empowers parents to choose the best educational environment for their children rather than being confined to failing public schools. Charter schools and voucher programs have already demonstrated improved student performance and higher satisfaction rates where implemented. Competition compels schools to improve, as they must attract students rather than merely receiving guaranteed federal funding.

Democrats profess to care about ordinary citizens, yet they oppose one of the most potent tools that would allow parents to choose their children's school. This hypocrisy is not new, but the hope is that school choice becomes the standard once the DOE is dismantled. This would mark a significant shift towards traditional values, limited government, and individual freedom, hallmarks of conservative thought.