Democrats' 'Parliamentary' Ploy: How Harris Bypassed Voters To Secure Nomination

Written by Published

In a surprising turn of events, Vice President Kamala Harris has emerged as the presumptive Democratic Party nominee without having to face a challenging primary.

This development came about after President Joe Biden unexpectedly withdrew from the presidential race and endorsed Harris. The Vice President's nomination is based on an insider party vote, with substantial verbal support from delegates, but lacking primary voter approval.

According to the Daily Caller, Jennifer Palmieri, former Obama White House communications director, expressed her delight over the situation on "Morning Joe". She suggested that this "parliamentary" process of nomination would be advantageous for Harris's presidential campaign. Palmieri stated, I think that its true, though, that the Republicans are really caught off guard. They dont quite know how to attack her or what her ticket is going to end up being.

Palmieri further argued that shorter campaigns could be more effective, especially for female candidates. She noted, Its particularly hard with a woman candidate to get elected in this country, right? Weve seen that before. When its happened other times in other countries, its happened in this sort of circumstance. This is where the nominee has not gone through a big, long, brutal primary process like happens in the U.S.

Drawing parallels with a parliamentary system, Palmieri emphasized that Harris is being presented as the party's leader and the most experienced candidate. She added, And I think thats one of the reasons why you see everyone uniting behind her, theres not second-guessing about what kind of candidate is best. Its like, shes our candidate. Shes the most experienced person out there. Shes the best prepared. Shes way more prepared than Donald Trump or J.D. Vance.

However, not everyone is pleased with the process that led to Harris's nomination. Progressive voters in Wisconsin voiced their dissatisfaction, although they confirmed they would still vote for Harris in the November election. One male voter expressed his concern, I think by trying to clear the field and ensure that it was going to be Biden and not allow us to have an actual democratic primary process Im not saying I think Kamala Harris is going to lose, but I do think that we would have been benefited significantly if he had figured this out far sooner so there could have actually been more time to have an internal debate, have internal democracy within the party.

Doug Schoen, a former adviser to President Bill Clinton, also expressed his disapproval of the process. He stated, I have trouble with the process that was put in place to very quickly rubber stamp her nomination. No mini primary, no open convention. Basically, the deal was done in 48 hours. I have a problem with that.

Despite these concerns, former President Barack Obama publicly endorsed Harris for president five days after Biden's withdrawal, further solidifying her position as the presumptive nominee. As the political landscape continues to shift, it remains to be seen how these developments will impact the upcoming election.