The protracted anticipation surrounding the Ukraine conflict has finally reached a resolution.
Western powers, during the NATO summit in Washington, declared the imminent arrival of the first F-16 jet fighters. These aircraft are expected to be operational by the summer, marking a significant milestone in less than six weeks.
Ukraine will soon receive the fourth-generation fighter jets to combat Russia, albeit in significantly fewer numbers than initially requested. According to Bloomberg, the decision to dispatch warplanes, a highly publicized aspect of the recent NATO summit, has been plagued by delays, spare parts issues, and language barriers between Ukrainian pilots and their foreign trainers. Concerns have also been raised about the country's limited runway capacity and their vulnerability to Russian attacks.
The outcome is that Ukraine may only be able to deploy a squadron of F-16s, ranging from 15 to 24 jets, falling drastically short of the 300 its leaders have requested. One source revealed that Kiev anticipates receiving six F-16s this summer and up to 20 by the end of the year.
However, as these much-anticipated aircraft arrive, there are already calls for the public to temper their expectations. Ukrainian airfields remain vulnerable targets, with Russia having already launched repeated attacks on some of them.
Jake Sullivan, Bidens chief national security adviser, confirmed on Thursday that the transfer of jets is in progress and that they will be operational in Ukraine by summer. Denmark and the Netherlands are supplying the planes, with Belgium and Norway also pledging jets. Sullivan added that the F-16s are expected to defend front-line forces in the short term and assist in reclaiming territory 'down the road'. He refrained from providing further details.
It took over a year to reach this point, since the frail US President Joe Biden succumbed to pressure and withdrew his opposition to sending the F-16s. Ukrainian pilots, accustomed to Soviet-era MiGs, also had to be trained to be less dependent on ground controllers.
Serge Stroobants, founder of Brussels-based BANTS Consulting, expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of the F-16s, stating, "Its more a burden than a blessing, with minimal impact before many, many months and great chances of losing many planes and pilots. An F-16 is more than a plane and a pilot, its a team of nearly 200 people who all play a role in getting the plane off the ground."
As the planes begin to arrive, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has shifted his stance, arguing that the number of aircraft is insufficient and will not make a significant difference. Business Insider reported that Zelensky compared the jets to the US-made Abrams tanks that Ukraine received last fall, suggesting that the low number of tanks could alter the battlefield situation, and the same applies to the fighter jets.
In a conversation with Fox News host Bret Baier during the NATO summit, Zelensky hinted that the usefulness of the jets depends on their quantity and timing. He compared the situation to his mother waiting for him after school, but with much higher stakes. He identified the 'problem' with the F-16s as their number and delivery dates.
Russia's vast number of combat aircraft means that a small number of F-16s would not significantly impact the conflict. Zelensky stated, "Even if we will have 50, its nothing. They have 300. Because we are defending, we need 128." He added that unless Ukraine had that number of F-16s, they wouldn't be able to compete with Russia in the sky, making the situation 'difficult'.
Zelensky's dissatisfaction with the number and timing of the US-made F-16 fighter jet delivery raises questions about the effectiveness of this military aid. It remains to be seen whether these jets will significantly alter the dynamics of the conflict or merely serve as a symbolic gesture of support from the West.
Login