The House Judiciary Committee has initiated legal proceedings against the Department of Justice (DOJ), seeking a preliminary injunction to expedite the case concerning the audio recordings of President Joe Biden's interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur.
The committee's stance is clear: "this Court should enter a preliminary injunction ordering Garland to comply with the Judiciary Committees Subpoena. Alternatively, the Court should grant summary judgment to the Committee on the issue of executive privilege, declare that Garlands refusal to produce the audio recordings is unlawful, and order Garland to produce the audio recordings to the Committee."
According to The Post Millennial, the House attorneys have underscored the urgency of the injunction, citing the dwindling time of the 118th Congress. They argue that the audio recordings are vital for lawmakers to carry out their oversight duties and conclude their impeachment inquiry. The recordings in question originate from Hur's interview with Biden last autumn, which was part of a probe into allegations of mishandling classified material. The investigation did find Biden guilty of mishandling classified documents, but refrained from prosecution, fearing that a jury would view Biden as a "well-meaning, elderly man," with a poor memory. These tapes could shed more light on the presidents cognitive abilities, especially as he faces mounting pressure to withdraw from the 2024 presidential race.
Despite the DOJ's release of a transcript of the interview, Republicans argue that the transcript alone is not enough. They maintain that the audio tapes are the "best evidence," especially since the transcript has reportedly been edited, including the removal of "filler words" used by the president. The transcripts do not capture either verbal context (tone, emphasis, inflection, volume, and pace) or nonverbal context (hesitating and pausing), House attorneys argued.
The DOJ has consistently invoked executive privilege as a reason for withholding the audio recordings, also suggesting that their release could render them vulnerable to artificial intelligence manipulation. Attorney General Merrick Garland, despite being subpoenaed for the tapes, has not complied, citing executive privilege by the White House. In response, House Republicans have attempted to hold Garland in inherent contempt and filed a lawsuit at the beginning of July.
If the judge approves the preliminary injunction, Garland would be obligated to comply with the subpoena immediately while the case undergoes further legal scrutiny. The House Judiciary Committee is not alone in its pursuit of the tapes. Other organizations, including watchdog group Judicial Watch and CNN, have also sought access to the tapes under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
However, the DOJ has argued that FOIA exemptions related to executive privilege justify their refusal to release the recordings. This ongoing legal battle underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in government, values that are central to conservative principles.
Login