Democrat Senate hopeful Roy Cooper is facing mounting scrutiny after his campaign worked with campus activists and sympathetic faculty to promote a debunked narrative of racist voter suppression at North Carolina universities in an apparent bid to energize black turnout.
According to The Post Millennial, Coopers operation seized on a routine administrative decision by a local election board and recast it as a civil-rights crisis. The campaign claimed that officials in Greensboro were targeting black voters by removing an early-voting site from the campus of North Carolina A&T State University, the largest historically black university in the state.
Cooper personally amplified the allegation in an August appearance on MS NOW, presenting himself as a victim of the supposed suppression. I went to North Carolina A&T State University, the largest HBCU in North Carolina. They removed that ballot box from their campus, he said, framing the issue as part of a broader national struggle.
He went on to portray student activists as a vanguard against Republican overreach, casting the midterms as a referendum on the constitutional order. But the students are marching to the nearest polling place and they're spreading the word that it's really important for them to get out and vote in this election because our country needs a course correction, Cooper added. And that's what they can do in these midterms by putting the checks and balances back into the Constitution that the framers intended.
That narrative quickly unraveled under basic scrutiny, including from media outlets that typically lean left. Fact checks by PolitiFact and Raleighs WRAL both conceded that Coopers rhetoric stretched the truth beyond recognition.
Cooper omitted key context: The campus has never hosted an early-voting site in a midterm election like the 2026 contest and it wasnt slated to have one this year, so his use of the word remove could be misleading, WRAL acknowledged in September. In other words, there was nothing to remove, and no evidence that the board had reversed any prior midterm practice at A&T.
North Carolina A&T has hosted an early-voting site during higher-turnout presidential cycles, including the 2024 election, when election officials routinely expand access across the board. The decision not to replicate that setup in a midterm appears to have been a standard logistical call by local administrators dealing with staffing and resource constraints, not a partisan plot to disenfranchise black students.
Yet even after being contradicted by mainstream outlets, Democrats and their activist allies chose to double down rather than correct the record. The hoax was repackaged for social media, where outrage is a political currency too valuable for the left to relinquish.
A viral post from the leftist account @allchronology recycled the false claim, asserting that hundreds of students had marched in protest of the supposed removal on the first day of early voting. The implication was clear: a spontaneous, grassroots uprising against a racist election board, conveniently timed to drive turnout for Democrats.
In academic circles, the narrative found eager amplifiers as well. On LinkedIn, Justin Catanoso, a journalism and media literacy professor at nearby Wake Forest University, reposted video from Todd Simmons, North Carolina A&Ts director of executive communications, and explicitly tied the demonstration to Greensboros most iconic civil-rights moment.
The Greensboro Four would be proud, Catanoso wrote, invoking the 1960 Woolworth lunch-counter sit-in that helped galvanize the Civil Rights Movement. The board of elections ought to be ashamed of itself.
The October 15 march at A&T also overlapped with another demonstration in downtown Greensboro, this one organized by the campus NAACP chapter. That event focused on the July 4 drowning of 18-year-old Mississippi resident Nolan Wells, a case activists have tried to frame as racially charged despite scant public evidence.
The Wells case has been aggressively promoted by Ben Crump, the high-profile attorney who built a national brand on the George Floyd case and similar controversies. His involvement suggests a broader, coordinated effort by national progressive operatives to manufacture racial grievance narratives in the run-up to the midterms, with the clear objective of boosting Democrat turnout.
Student activists in Greensboro again leaned on the symbolism of the Woolworth sit-in, implying that Wellss death carried the same civil-rights weight as the segregation-era struggle. They argued that because Wells disappeared after a day of drinking on a boat with several white friends in the Gulf of America, the tragedy should be read through the lens of systemic racism rather than personal responsibility or misfortune.
All of this is unfolding against a political backdrop that should, on paper, favor Republicans. Recent polling shows Cooper, a former two-term governor, holding a double-digit lead over former Republican National Committee chair Michael Whatley in a race that will determine who replaces ousted establishment Republican Thom Tillis.
More troubling for conservatives, Politico reported that Whatleys campaign had gone dark last week after a major ad pull, a sign that national GOP committees may be losing confidence in their former chairmans ability to close the gap. In a state that Donald Trump carried by 3.2 percentage points in 2024, such retreat raises questions about Republican strategy and commitment.
Data analyst Jennica Pounds, known online as DataRepublican, sounded the alarm on X after reviewing early-vote data. She noted that while early voting traditionally tilts Democrat, Thursdays preliminary returns painted an especially bleak picture for the GOP in North Carolina.
Cooper, she observed, was enjoying strong double-digit advantages among voters under 50, a demographic Republicans must at least compete with to remain viable statewide. That performance helps explain why Democrats are so eager to keep racial narratives in the headlines: fear and grievance remain powerful tools for mobilizing younger, left-leaning voters.
Ironically, the 69-year-old Cooper appears far less eager to discuss questions about his own fitness for office. The North State Journal reported that Democrat super-lawyer and Russiagate architect Marc Elias sent a cease-and-desist letter after the outlet asked whether Cooper was committed to fulfilling his six-year term if elected in November and if there were any health problems that might impede him.
Some observers speculate that Cooper views the Senate not as a capstone, but as a springboard, much as Barack Obama used his brief Senate tenure before launching a presidential bid in 2008. If that is the plan, the willingness of his campaign and its allies to stoke race-based hoaxes and suppress legitimate scrutiny of his health and intentions offers a revealing preview of the tactics voters can expect should he set his sights on the White House.
Login