Milwaukees latest election-night blunder has once again raised serious questions about the integrity and competence of the citys vote-counting process in a state that has repeatedly decided presidential contests by razor-thin margins.
According to Gateway Pundit, in the early hours of Wednesday morning, as Wisconsin primary results were still being tallied, Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Paulina Gutierrez acknowledged that five of the nine USB flash drives sent from the citys central count facility to Milwaukee County contained audit logs instead of actual election results. Its a human error, Gutierrez said, and when asked by WISN 12 if it was as simple as somebody pressing the wrong button, she replied, Correct.
Because of the mistake, officials had to return to the Central Count operations center, re-download the correct results from five tabulators, and then transport those drives back to the Milwaukee County Courthouse for re-uploading. Gutierrez admitted that nearly 15,000 ballots were still outstanding at the time of her statement, leaving a significant portion of the vote in limbo during the overnight hours.
Read that again: on five of the nine USB drives used in a critical election-night transfer, officials copied the wrong files. The confusion was so glaring that even MSNBCs data analyst Steve Kornacki appeared visibly stunned on air as the numbers failed to materialize on schedule.
For conservatives who have long warned about lax procedures in Democrat-controlled urban centers, the episode fits an all-too-familiar pattern. This is not the first time Milwaukee has been embroiled in controversy involving flash drives, absentee ballots, and suspiciously late-night result dumps that just happen to break heavily for Democrats.
Gateway Pundit readers will remember the 2020 presidential election, when then-Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall-Vogg lost one of the flash drives containing critical absentee ballot results in the middle of the night, right as Milwaukee dumped a massive wave of ballots that helped deliver Wisconsin to Joe Biden. Officials insisted the drive was never truly lost and that everything checked out, but the timing and circumstances fueled widespread distrust among supporters of President Donald Trump.
According to the official account, Woodall-Vogg realized while in transit that she had forgotten one of the physical flash drives still plugged into a tabulation machine. She allegedly called a senior staff member remaining at the facility, who retrieved the drive from the machine and handed it directly to a police officer, who then delivered it to Woodall-Vogg.
Skeptics were not convinced, and the incident quickly became a flashpoint in the broader debate over chain-of-custody failures and opaque counting practices in Democrat-run cities. For many voters, especially on the right, the idea that critical election data can be misplaced, recovered, and then accepted without independent verification is simply unacceptable in a constitutional republic.
The problems did not end in 2020. In 2024, Milwaukee election workers left tabulator doors unlocked and unsealed for hours while processing tens of thousands of absentee ballots, a basic security lapse that would be unthinkable in most private-sector operations handling sensitive data. Officials again called it human error and, out of an abundance of caution, zeroed the machines and reran more than 30,000 ballots, pushing results deep into the early morning.
Different election. Different personnel. Different procedural failure. Same city. Same late-night uncertainty, and the same expectation from the political left that the public simply trust the process without demanding rigorous safeguards, transparent chain-of-custody, and real accountability for repeated failures in a jurisdiction that can decide the fate of the nation.
Login