Los Angeles deepening homelessness crisis has now erupted into an open political war, as mayoral challenger and City Councilwoman Nithya Raman is being stripped of her role as chair of the citys Housing and Homelessness Committee and is publicly blaming incumbent Mayor Karen Bass for the move.
According to RedState, Raman, a self-described progressive and Democratic Socialist, is being removed just as the citys homelessness disaster continues unabated, with both her and Bass trading accusations while offering little in the way of tangible results. The shake-up is reportedly being orchestrated not directly by Bass, but by City Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson, a close ally of the mayor, who is expected to announce that the existing homelessness committee will be split into two separate panels. Raman, notably, will not be leading either of them, a clear demotion that undercuts her claims of being a central figure in addressing the crisis.
Ramans record as chair has been nothing short of dismal, despite the lofty rhetoric and progressive branding that helped propel her into office. She championed a $62.6 million housing initiative that, according to reports, managed to place just three households, a staggering failure rate that underscores the broader dysfunction of Los Angeles homelessness bureaucracy.
Rather than acknowledge that performance, Raman has taken to social media to insist that her ouster is political retribution from the mayors camp. Mayor Bass' top City Council ally removed me as Chair of the Housing and Homelessness Committee. The Mayor may be trying to punish me for challenging her, but Angelenos are the ones who pay the price for these political games, she declared in a video posted Monday, casting herself as a victim of insider maneuvering rather than a failed policymaker.
The reality, however, is that Angelenos have been paying the price for years under the stewardship of the same progressive policies Raman has championed. Her own Council District 4 remains plagued by encampments and disorder, offering little evidence that her approach has delivered anything resembling a turnaround, despite the vast sums of taxpayer money at her disposal.
Bass, for her part, has not hesitated to hit back, making clear that she views Ramans tenure as a cautionary tale rather than a model. Nithya Raman canceled committee meetings for weeks, didnt show up to votes, and failed to deliver on building more housing or getting people off the streets, said Alex Stack, a campaign spokesperson for Bass, in a blistering assessment of Ramans leadership.
Stack went further, directly attacking Ramans marquee initiative and contrasting it with Bass own record. Her signature program has been a failure, spending over $60 million for nearly a year but only filling 3 apartments. Karen Bass approached these crises with urgency, cleaning up over 120 encampments and unlocking 100,000 new homes, he said, framing Bass as the more competent manager within a deeply flawed system.
Yet even Bass claims of urgency and cleaning up ring hollow when measured against the scale of the problem and the ideological blinders that both women share. The Trump administration, recognizing the dysfunction in Los Angeles homelessness apparatus, previously pulled federal funds from the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA), a sprawling agency that has long appeared more adept at absorbing money than delivering results, as RedState editor Jennifer Van Laar has documented.
Federal investigators found that LAHSA failed to verify nearly 2,300 housing sites it was supposed to oversee, while roughly 70 percent of contracts tied to those locations showed no reported spending in the prior year. Despite those damning findings, Ramans committee still approved another $358 million for LAHSA in the current budget cycle, with city officials claiming they lacked the infrastructure to replace the agency and Raman arguing that the chaos merely proved her call for stronger city oversight.
This is the progressive model in practice: pour hundreds of millions into a broken bureaucracy, ignore glaring red flags, and then insist that the answer is more oversight, more spending, and more of the same ideology that created the mess. The political infighting now on display is less a clash of visions than a struggle over who gets to control the levers of a failing system that has already consumed billions.
The feud between Bass and Raman is not occurring in a vacuum; it is part of a broader pattern of left-wing power struggles across California, where Democrats compete to outflank one another on the ideological left while basic governance collapses. As RedState has reported, outgoing Rep. Nancy Pelosi is currently locked in a bitter dispute with state Sen. Scott Wiener over an AI chatbot video that Pelosi denounced as racist and sexist, another example of progressive elites devoting their energy to intra-party warfare and identity politics rather than public order and accountability.
Meanwhile, the human toll in Los Angeles continues to mount. The city is home to roughly 45,000 homeless individuals, a figure that rises to about 73,000 when including the entire county, and despite a slight downward trend in some metrics in recent years, the number of people living on the streets jumped by eight percent in 2026, even as billions upon billions were funneled into housing and services.
The fundamental misdiagnosis at the heart of the citys strategy remains unaddressed: a stubborn insistence that homelessness is primarily a housing issue, rather than a complex crisis driven heavily by addiction, mental illness, and permissive policies that enable street living. As one critic put it bluntly, Wow. Both mayoral candidates are still pushing housing as a solution for a DRUG PROBLEM. Delusional scammers. LA is so cooked. I was the only candidate talking about the real fix, so now you can enjoy Skid Row expanding even more! Don't let communists run your city!
Neither Bass nor Raman can credibly claim success while encampments spread, crime rises, and taxpayers are forced to bankroll programs that deliver negligible results. Their escalating feud may offer some political theater, but for residents watching their neighborhoods deteriorate, it is a stark reminder that the citys entrenched progressive leadership has run out of excuses, even as it clings tightly to the same failed playbook.
Login