Schumer And Gillibrand Back El-Sayed After Michigan Senate Primary Victory

Written by Published

Senate Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand have thrown their full weight behind Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed, hailing his primary victory and vowing to help carry him over the finish line in November.

According to The Post Millennial, the pair issued a glowing statement after El-Sayed secured the Democratic nomination, casting the Michigan race as a linchpin in their bid to reclaim the Senate majority. "Abdul El-Sayed has run an energetic campaign that inspired thousands of Michiganders across the state, with a clear focus on lowering costs and standing up for working families, the statement declared, signaling the party establishments embrace of a candidate firmly aligned with the progressive left.

The Senate leaders stressed that Democrats intend to close ranks behind El-Sayed despite mounting concerns over his record and rhetoric. Democrats are united by a common purpose: putting a check on Donald Trump by defeating his Republican enablers and taking back the Senate. We look forward to working with Abdul and Democrats across Michigan to win this seat in November.

Schumer and Gillibrand also moved quickly to define the general-election contrast by attacking Republican nominee and former congressman Mike Rogers as an extension of the Trump agenda. Mike Rogers is a rubber stamp for Donald Trump, backing the same reckless agenda that has driven up costs for working families, imposed chaotic tariffs that have hurt Michigan's auto industry, and put special interests ahead of the people of Michigan. Michigan voters already rejected Rogers after he walked through Washington's revolving door to enrich himself. They'll reject him again in November and send Abdul El-Sayed to the United States Senate.

That endorsement, however, immediately triggered a fierce backlash from the Republican Jewish Coalition, which accused Democratic leaders of ignoring El-Sayeds history of inflammatory statements about Israel. The RJC blasted Schumer and Gillibrand, who chairs the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, as cowards for pledging to help El-Sayed defeat Rogers despite those remarks.

El-Sayed has previously labeled Israel bloodthirsty, accused the Jewish state of committing genocide, and described it as an illegal apartheid regime. Such language places him on the farthest edge of the progressive movements anti-Israel wing, raising serious questions about the Democratic Partys willingness to tolerate open hostility toward Americas closest ally in the Middle East.

Sam Markstein, national political director and spokesman for the RJC, told JNS that Chuck Schumer and the rest of the Democratic Party are complete and total cowards. He argued that the partys embrace of El-Sayed exposes a widening gulf between Democratic rhetoric on antisemitism and its actual political choices.

Abdul El-Sayed is the most antisemitic candidate for the US Senate in America, and yet, their party leadership is rallying around him, Markstein said. November is a clear choice between Democrat crazy and Republican common sense.

Schumers decision to back El-Sayed is particularly striking given that just over a year ago the New York senator released a book titled Antisemitism in America: A Warning, which purported to sound the alarm about rising anti-Jewish hatred. His support for a candidate who has vilified Israel in such stark terms underscores, for many conservatives, the deep hypocrisy and moral confusion now gripping the Democratic Party.

In Michigan specifically, this is a choice between Mike Rogers, who will stand with Michigans Jewish community as he has always done, and Abdul El-Sayed, who will defend the people who come after us, Markstein told JNS, pointing to Rogers longstanding pro-Israel record. Where Democrats failed, Republicans will clean up their mess, he added, framing the race as a referendum on which party can be trusted to confront antisemitism and support Americas allies.

El-Sayeds candidacy is also drawing renewed scrutiny over his ties to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the substantial financial backing he has received from individuals linked to the group. El-Sayed collected more than $115,000 from at least 41 donors who currently work for CAIR, previously worked for the organization, or have held leadership roles within it, deepening concerns about the ideological influences surrounding his campaign.

Those donors include CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad, National Board Chair Manal Fakhoury, National Board Treasurer Eyas Abdeen, National Vice Chair Emad Sabbah, and CAIR-Michigan board member Jukaku Tayeb, who is also El-Sayeds father-in-law. For many on the right, this network of support reinforces the perception that El-Sayed represents a radical, activist-driven agenda far removed from the values of mainstream Michigan voters.

On policy, El-Sayed is running on a platform that reads like a wish list of the progressive left, including abolishing ICE, reforming the Supreme Court, imposing a billionaire tax, enacting Medicare for all, and expanding abortion protections. With Democrats rallying behind that agenda and Republicans coalescing around Rogers more traditional, pro-Israel, law-and-order conservatism, Michigans Senate race is shaping up as a stark ideological showdown over the direction of the country, the future of the Democratic Party, and whether voters will reward or reject the partys embrace of its most radical voices.