Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., is facing sharp backlash after asserting that the House-passed National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) would merge parts of our military with the Israel Defense Forces, a claim critics say grossly mischaracterizes the legislation.
The controversy centers on Section 219 of the fiscal year 2027 NDAA, a provision that seeks to deepen U.S.-Israel defense integration through expanded cooperation on military technology, supply chains, research, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity and joint exercises. According to Fox News, the House approved its version of the NDAA in a 219-206 vote, leaving Section 219 fully intact despite objections from the progressive left and a small number of skeptics on the right.
Ahead of the vote, Ocasio-Cortez took to X to warn that the NDAA includes a provision to merge parts of our military with the IDF. She escalated her rhetoric further, declaring, This amendment is an existential threat to American sovereignty and democracy, and insisting, Every member of Congress must vote NO.
Her post immediately drew condemnation from Republican lawmakers and officials serving in President Trumps administration, who argued that the measure merely strengthens long-standing defense cooperation with Israel rather than fusing the two armed forces. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin denounced her characterization as FALSE, accusing the New York Democrat of deliberately misleading the public about the bills contents.
Instead of merging the part of your brain that hates Jews with the part of your brain concocting your daily lies, you should try merging the part of your brain responsible for reading bill text with the part of your brain responsible for critical thinking, Zeldin wrote on X. Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., likewise rebuked Ocasio-Cortez and urged her to stop stoking Jew hatred, saying her rhetoric fuels hostility toward Americas closest ally in the Middle East.
Good grief, you are either obtuse or intentionally lying. We are not merging our military with the IDF, Lawler wrote, underscoring what many conservatives see as a pattern of inflammatory and inaccurate claims from the congresswoman. He argued that Section 219 simply broadens the kind of defense cooperation the United States already maintains with key allies, including intelligence sharing, joint military exercises and collaborative weapons development that enhance deterrence without compromising U.S. sovereignty.
While Republicans rejected Ocasio-Cortezs description as reckless, some lawmakers who opposed the provision raised narrower concerns about its scope and oversight. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., introduced an amendment to strike Section 219 from the bill, but House leadership declined to allow a vote on his proposal, prompting him to withdraw support for the broader package.
Unfortunately the Rule passed just now and no debate or vote was allowed on section 219, integration of US military technology and supply chains with Israel's, Massie wrote on X. The NDAA will receive a recorded vote tomorrow with section 219 in it. I'll vote no.
Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., who joined Massie in pushing to remove the provision, also faulted leadership for blocking debate, claiming Congress had shut down consideration of a proposal to halt the integration of our military with Israel's. It is unconscionable to not even have a vote, Khanna wrote on X, adding, We will be continuing on and will not be intimidated by the pro-Israel lobby.
As President Trumps administration continues to prioritize a strong U.S.-Israel alliance, Section 219s supporters frame it as a logical extension of existing cooperation that bolsters national security and technological superiority. Fox News Digital reported that Ocasio-Cortezs office was asked to clarify her remarks, but as of publication, her staff had not responded, leaving her sweeping claims about merging militaries and existential threats to American democracy unsubstantiated.
Login