CNN anchor Dana Bash seized on a weekend march by the fringe Patriot Front group in Washington, DC, to pressure Interior Secretary Doug Burgum into denouncing the demonstrators and, by extension, to tarnish President Donald Trump and his supporters.
According to Gateway Pundit, Bash framed the event as a grave national episode, opening her segment with a dramatic pivot. Turning to something much more serious that happened yesterday, she declared, describing how several 100 masked men belonging to the white nationalist group, the Patriot Front, marched with Confederate flags, and they did it through neighborhoods in the US Capitol, at least near the Capitol, and they chanted Reclaim America. She then highlighted a single viral image, telling Burgum, Theres a widely circulated photograph, Im sure youve seen it, taken by Reuters of an African American woman on a subway surrounded by members of this group. Are you concerned about this?
The photograph in question shows a black woman calmly seated on a DC Metro train car filled with Patriot Front marchers, none of whom appear to be interacting with her in any way. Editors at Reuters are reportedly now attempting to track down the woman to build out a broader narrative about supposedly omnipresent white racism, despite the lack of any visible confrontation in the image.
Bash pressed Burgum further, attempting to force a categorical denunciation that would fit neatly into CNNs preferred storyline. Do you condemn this group and what they were doing, and more, most importantly, what they stand for? she asked, clearly hoping for a soundbite that could be weaponized against the Trump administration and its supporters. Burgum, however, responded with a defense of core American principles rather than a made-for-TV condemnation.
Well, I think that the certainly is what they stand for is nothing that I could possibly agree with, but one of the foundational principles the United States, which makes democracy messy, is free speech, and there are plenty of things that I see that I might personally find offensive, irreprehensible, but in America, free speech is allowed, and this is by the whole spectrum of things, Burgum replied. He pointed out that while fringe groups on the right are relentlessly spotlighted, the country is simultaneously grappling with literal Communists infiltrating its institutions and political life.
I mean, were a country where someone can run and be elected saying that theyre a communist, but yet this is what our nation has stood against and fought for because were about life and liberty, Burgum continued. Were not about death and tyranny, which we know communism has brought across the country and across history, so there are plenty things in history, and those things can pop up, but the good news is these small things, I think, are the rare example. What we saw last night, what weve seen this week is people unifying around our country, unifying around the flag.
Unwilling to let the matter rest, Bash tried again to box Burgum in politically by tying his role in the administration to a demand for presidential condemnation. As Interior Secretary, will you recommend to the President that he condemn this group and what they were trying to message, what they did try to message here in Washington? she asked, attempting to elevate a small, nonviolent march into a national crisis requiring White House intervention.
Burgum responded by pointing out the double standard in how protests are treated depending on their political alignment. Part of my response to that is that there are protests on the Mall that people say things that I think are irreprehensible about President Trump, and yet theyre allowed to go on because of free speech in our country, he said, before Bash abruptly cut him off with the emphatic assertion, This is White nationalism. Bash then tried to reclaim the narrative, saying, Its as you said, a part of Americas history that still has pockets, but the fact that they were here in Washington on such an important day. I do want to move on, only for Burgum to push back once more.
But I do think, again, I mean, there are people that are saying death to Israel and death to America. I mean, this is part of free speech in America. They can say it, we can object to it, but it is, it is something that comes with free speech in America, Burgum said, underscoring that the First Amendment protects speech across the spectrum, including rhetoric far more extreme than anything seen in the Patriot Front march. His point highlighted a reality the corporate media rarely acknowledges: the same constitutional protections that allow fringe right-wing groups to march also shield left-wing radicals who openly call for violence against America and its allies.
While CNN and other left-leaning outlets demand that Republicans ritually denounce every marginal right-wing group that appears in public, they almost never insist that Democrats disavow Antifa or other far-left agitators. These are the same groups that have repeatedly engaged in street violence, property destruction, and explicit calls for the death of President Trump and his supporters, often in the very city where Patriot Fronts march took place. Yet the medias outrage is curiously selective, reserved for spectacles that can be used to smear conservatives while ignoring leftist mobs that actually harm people and communities.
As Gateway Pundit has previously reported, many observers on the right view Patriot Front with deep suspicion, believing it to be an operation orchestrated or infiltrated by federal agencies or left-wing organizations such as the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) to discredit conservatives and nationalism. Notably, the Charlottesville Unite the Right rally, from which Patriot Front emerged, was coordinated in part by the SPLC, raising serious questions about the origins and purpose of these highly choreographed appearances.
According to a Department of Justice indictment of the SPLC, the organization was charged with 11 counts of wire fraud, false statements to a federally insured bank, and conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering. The indictment alleges that the SPLC paid a field source during the 2017 Unite the Right rally to incite violence, after which Patriot Front suddenly appeared on the scene as a new, media-ready white nationalist brand. The timing and optics have fueled widespread speculation that such groups are less organic movements than convenient props for a narrative that paints all nationalism as inherently extremist.
During the latest march, Patriot Front members were seen assembling and moving out from Washingtons Union Station, chanting Life, Liberty, Victory and Reclaim America! They wore a uniform-style outfit of khaki pants, navy blue shirts, green hats, combat boots, and white face masks to conceal their identities, while carrying a mix of American and Confederate flags.
Some marchers displayed the American flag upside down, a traditional signal of distress that the media eagerly framed as another sign of extremism. Yet despite the breathless coverage, there were no reports of violence or attacks associated with the demonstration, underscoring Burgums argument that the event, while distasteful to many, fell squarely within the bounds of constitutionally protected expression.
The episode ultimately revealed less about the actual threat posed by a few hundred masked marchers and more about the priorities of a media establishment determined to conflate fringe theatrics with mainstream conservatism. While CNN fixates on a staged-looking march that harmed no one, it downplays or excuses the ongoing menace of left-wing extremism, from Antifa riots to open calls for death to Israel and death to America on college campuses and city streets. For Americans who still value free speech, equal justice, and honest reporting, Burgums insistence on applying First Amendment principles consistently stands in stark contrast to a press corps that treats those principles as optional, depending on who is speaking.
Login