Kamala Harris has escalated Democrat attacks on election integrity, accusing the Virginia Supreme Court of having ignored the will of the people after it struck down a partisan redistricting scheme that would have dramatically tilted the states congressional map to the left.
Her comments came after the court, in a narrow 43 ruling, invalidated a constitutional amendment and associated maps that would have entrenched Democrat power in Virginias congressional delegation, according to Breitbart. In a post on X, Harris claimed the decision gives a boost to President Donald Trumps efforts to try to rig the upcoming midterm elections and insisted that while Democrats were rightfully outraged, they would continue their fight to restore the power of the people.
Last month in Virginia, the people made their voices heard at the ballot box and voted for new Congressional maps Harris wrote. Today, the Virginia Supreme Court ignored the will of the people and overturned those democratically chosen maps. Harris framed the ruling as part of a broader Republican strategy, declaring, This ruling gives a boost to Donald Trumps efforts to rig the 2026 elections and the Republicans long game to attack voting rights.
We are rightfully outraged, but we will not give up. We must continue our fight to restore the power of the people, she added, casting judicial enforcement of the state constitution as an assault on democracy rather than a safeguard against partisan abuse. The Virginia Supreme Court, however, found that the legislative process employed to advance the redistricting referendum violated Article XII, Section 1 of the Constitution of Virginia.
On March 6, 2026, the General Assembly of Virginia submitted to Virginia voters a proposed constitutional amendment that authorizes partisan gerrymandering of congressional districts in the Commonwealth, the court said in its decision. We hold that the legislative process employed to advance this proposal violated Article XII, Section 1 of the Constitution of Virginia. The rejected plan would have transformed Virginias congressional map from six Democrat and five Republican districts to 10 Democrat and just one Republican seat, effectively wiping out meaningful competition.
While Republicans such as former Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) and President Trump welcomed the ruling as a victory for constitutional limits and against naked partisan gerrymandering, Democrats denounced it as judicial overreach. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) claimed the court had silenced millions of voters, saying, Over three million Virginia citizens cast their votes in a free and fair election, yet the State Supreme Court has chosen to invalidate their voice, disenfranchise them and violate their due process rights.
The decision to overturn an entire election is an unprecedented and undemocratic action that cannot stand, Jeffries said, ignoring the courts finding that lawmakers had violated the states foundational legal charter. The clash in Virginia underscores a deeper national divide: conservatives insisting that constitutional procedures and checks on partisan power are essential to genuine self-government, and Democrats portraying any constraint on their electoral engineering as an attack on voting rights even when those constraints prevent one-party dominance.
Login