A veteran Southwest Airlines flight attendant has secured nearly $1 million after a federal court found she was unlawfully fired for expressing her pro-life religious beliefs and objecting to her unions pro-abortion activism.
According to WND, Charlene Carter, a longtime Southwest employee, was terminated in 2017 after she sent graphic anti-abortion messages to leaders of Transport Workers Union Local 556. She had previously resigned from the union over what she viewed as its aggressive pro-abortion agenda, and she sent the messages to protest the unions endorsement of the 2017 Womens March, a high-profile pro-abortion demonstration linked to Planned Parenthood.
Despite her resignation, Carter was still compelled under the terms of her employment to pay union-related fees, a practice long criticized by conservatives as coerced support for political causes. She sued both Southwest and the union, arguing they retaliated against her because of her religious convictions, and in 2022 a federal jury agreed, finding that the airline and the union had violated her rights.
That verdict was later upheld by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, reinforcing legal protections for workers who dissent from union-backed left-wing causes. U.S. District Judge Brantley Starr ordered Southwest to reinstate Carter and pay her more than $810,000 in damages, including about $150,000 in back pay. The judge also required the airline to notify employees of their rights against religious discrimination, the report explained.
Months later, Judge Starr held Southwest in contempt, stating the carrier flaunted the courts original order by twisting words in its employee notice. The case has now been resolved with a payment of $946,102.87 to Carter, a substantial sum that underscores the legal risk corporations face when they punish employees for faith-based, pro-life speech.
Flight attendants should have a voice and nobody should be able to retaliate against a flight attendant for engaging in protected speech against her union, she said. Southwest, aligning with progressive corporate norms, had claimed her pro-life messages amounted to harassment rather than protected expression.
Carters attorneys maintained throughout the litigation that her pro-life views are protected religious expression and that no employee should face retaliation for opposing the use of union dues for causes they find morally objectionable. The jurys verdict and the airlines payment affirm that position, the report said. For many conservatives, Carters victory represents a rare but significant pushback against union overreach, compelled speech, and the broader effort to marginalize religious and pro-life voices in the workplace.
Login