Republican Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna is escalating her challenge to the political and intelligence establishment, asserting that Jeffrey Epstein was not merely a serial predator but the central figure in a foreign honey pot operation designed to ensnare and compromise Americas ruling class.
According to The Gateway Pundit, Luna now contends that Epsteins activities went far beyond sordid criminality and into the realm of espionage and blackmail. Drawing on new testimony and documents obtained through the House Oversight Committees ongoing inquiry, she argues that the late financier was running a sophisticated honey pot intelligence-gathering scheme aimed at leveraging powerful politicians and corporate elites for economic and political advantage.
Luna, who leads a task force on government secrets within the Oversight Committee, framed her conclusions bluntly in a post on X, underscoring the gravity of what she believes Congress has uncovered. Based on our congressional investigation it is my professional opinion that Jeffrey Epstein was running a honey pot operation. I am calling on Oversight to bring these 4 women in for questioning as co-conspirators to child sex trafficking.
Her remarks followed a tense closed-door deposition of former President Bill Clinton before the committee, after which Luna held a fiery press conference to outline her findings. What I will say is it has become very evident, even in the last 24 hours, through lines of questioning, that Jeffrey Epstein was running an intelligence-gathering operation. In my professional opinion, I do believe it was a honeypot operation, Luna said.
She suggested that Epsteins reach extended into the highest levels of American political life, including the Clinton orbit, with a particular focus on economic policy and global influence. I do believe that Jeffrey Epstein was targeting many politicians, many influential people, especially in regards to economic policy, Luna added. I do believe that it was possible that not just (Bill Clinton), but Secretary Clinton as well as a number of other people were targeted.
Unlike many in Washington who have preferred to speak in abstractions about networks and associates, Luna directly identified individuals she believes should be treated as suspects, not shielded as victims. I do believe that theres a list of individuals who did engage in trafficking, were given these plea deals, and Im going to name those individuals right now. The first one would be Leslie Groff, the second one, Sarah Kellen. The third one, Nadia Marcinkova. And the fourth one, Adriana Ross. All of these women engaged in the trafficking of minors as adults. They were working and complicit with Jeffrey Epsteins operation. In my opinion, they are not to be given victim status because they did partake in harming young girls.
Luna stressed that the evidence she has reviewed shows the depravity of the operation and the youth of the victims, challenging the narrative that these women were merely exploited by Epstein. In my opinion, they are not to be given victim status because they did partake in harming young girls. I remember seeing in some of the files that some of these girls were as young as 10 or 11 years old.
She emphasized that the investigation is far from over, but indicated that Clinton, at least for now, is cooperating with congressional inquiries. And so, obviously, we have a lot of work to do. But I did want to come and give an update and let you know that President Clinton, as of right now, is cooperative and answering all of our questions, and that it leads me to believe that if we can remove the partisan nature of this investigation, we actually might be able to get justice.
Luna vowed to press the Oversight Committee to compel testimony from the four women she named, framing this as a test of whether Congress is serious about accountability or still beholden to entrenched interests. And so, I will be calling on the Oversight Committee to bring in those four individuals that I just listed. We will continue to conduct the investigation and provide updates shortly for all of you.
Her claims intersect with long-standing concerns on the right that Epsteins lenient treatment by federal authorities was not a bureaucratic fluke but the result of protection from within the intelligence and law-enforcement apparatus. It can be recalled that Alex Acosta, who served as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida from June 2005 to June 2009 under President George W. Bush, previously claimed he was told to back off Epstein because he belonged to intelligence.
During transition interviews, when Acosta was being vetted to serve as President Donald Trumps Labor Secretary, he reportedly explained that he had been instructed to stand down. During those discussions, Acosta revealed that he was informed Jeffrey Epstein belonged to intelligence, that the case was above his pay grade, and that he was instructed to leave it alone.
Years later, Acosta publicly tried to narrow the implications of those remarks, insisting he had not personally verified Epsteins alleged intelligence ties. In a July 2020 C-SPAN clip, Acosta clarified that he never directly confirmed Epstein was an intelligence asset. He simply repeated what he was told.
The notion that Epstein was more than a lone criminal has been bolstered by additional reporting suggesting he enjoyed extraordinary protection from federal authorities. The Gateway Pundit also reported that an exclusive leak obtained by RadarOnline.com reveals that disgraced pedophile Jeffrey Epstein was not only shielded by the U.S. justice system, but was in fact a covert FBI informant, effectively working for intelligence years before his notorious 2007 plea deal.
Conservative outlets have long questioned why Epstein received such a sweetheart arrangement, especially under the watch of powerful federal figures. In 2018, The Gateway Pundit reported that Jeffrey Epstein was not just protected by federal authorities but may have actively worked as an informant for the FBI under former Director Robert Mueller.
Documents released through a successful Freedom of Information Act lawsuit appear to show that Epsteins cooperation with the FBI was explicitly tied to the decision not to pursue federal charges. According to the uncovered documents released under a successful Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit: On 9/11/08, case agent advised writer that Epstein is currently being prosecuted by the State of Florida and is complying with all conditions of his please with the State of Florida. Epstein has also provided information to the FBI as agreed upon. Case agent advised that no federal prosecution will occur in this matter as long as Epstein continues to uphold his agreement with the State of Florida. Case agent also advised that no further forfeiture assistance will be required for this case. Case agent is requested to contact writer in the event this matter moves forward on a federal level.
For many Americans, especially on the right, these revelations reinforce a deeply troubling picture: a two-tiered justice system that shields the well-connected while ordinary citizens face the full weight of federal power. Lunas push to subpoena alleged female co-conspirators, revisit Epsteins intelligence ties, and strip away partisan protection for figures like the Clintons speaks directly to conservative demands for transparency, equal justice, and an end to what they see as a permanent security-state class operating above the law.
Login