The spectacle of a senior Democratic lawmaker apparently dozing through a high-stakes hearing on the Jeffrey Epstein scandal has become an unwitting symbol of his partys misplaced priorities and performative outrage.
The incident unfolded during a contentious House hearing convened to scrutinize the Department of Justices handling of the Epstein files, a proceeding that quickly devolved into partisan theater rather than sober oversight, according to Western Journal. Attorney General Pam Bondi, called to testify, faced a barrage of personal attacks from Democrats who seemed more interested in scoring political points than in uncovering the truth about Epsteins network and the governments response.
Observers noted that it was clear from what unfolded that Attorney General Pam Bondi, who was peppered with all manner of ad hominem attacks from Democrats, was forced to stand her ground. It was equally apparent that Democrats had nothing substantive on the Epstein issue, and just wanted to parrot the same criticisms against Bondi, recycling talking points instead of pressing for meaningful answers on behalf of victims.
Amid this spectacle, Democratic New York Rep. Jerry Nadler distinguished himself not through incisive questioning or moral clarity, but through sheer indifference. Cameras captured Nadler slumped in his chair during the very hearing in which he was ostensibly defending Epsteins victims, as a staffer leaned in to rouse the 78-year-old congressman from what appeared to be a mid-hearing nap.
Yes, thats Nadler, sitting in on a very important hearing, having to be woken up from a nap by a staffer who clearly isnt paid enough to babysit the 78-year-old lawmaker. For any elected official, that image alone would be humiliating, particularly in a forum dealing with one of the most disturbing sex-trafficking scandals in recent memory.
Yet Nadler compounded the embarrassment by adopting a posture of moral superiority toward Bondi once he was awake and in front of the microphones. In a heated exchange, he actually had the gall to accuse Bondi of not caring about the Epstein victims, questioning her concern even as his own conduct suggested a lack of basic engagement with the proceedings.
Look, if youre going to attack somebodys character by accusing them of not caring enough, the least you can do is care enough to stay awake during the pertinent proceedings. Nadler, however, couldnt even hurdle that amazingly low bar, undermining his own credibility and, by extension, that of his Democratic colleagues who joined in the attacks.
For many conservatives, the episode serves as a revealing snapshot of the modern Democratic Partys governing style and priorities. If theres a chance to attack, demean, or insult the administration of President Donald Trump, theyll show up with zeal and attentiveness for days, but if theres a chance to legislate and discuss issues that actually matter to Americans? Theyre behind their desk snoozing away quite literally.
Login