New York Governor Kathy Hochul is steering the Empire State towards the legalization of medically assisted suicide, a move that has been controversially rebranded as "medical aid in dying."
Critics argue that this is a euphemistic term that obscures the reality of the situation: the state-sanctioned ending of human life.
According to Gateway Pundit, in an op-ed published by the Times Union, Hochul made it clear that she intends to sign the so-called Medical Aid in Dying Act. This legislation would permit terminally ill patients with less than six months to live to receive drugs designed to hasten their demise. Supporters of the proposal describe it as a compassionate measure, while opponents view it as a form of state-sanctioned suicide.
In her op-ed, Hochul attempted to justify the legislation by invoking America's founding principles. She claimed that "limited government and broad individual rights" somehow validate the decision to empower doctors to assist patients in ending their lives. She framed the issue as one of "bodily autonomy," aligning assisted suicide with abortion, LGBTQ ideology, and other far-left priorities that New York Democrats have been pushing for years.
Hochul's stance reflects the modern Left's emphasis on "choice" as the ultimate moral consideration, even when that choice involves ending a human life.
During a press conference, Hochul stated, "So none of us are immune from that. Such as life and so is death two forces in life that are inevitable. And so I was moved by their courage and I wanted to help them put an end to a decades long journey and say, 'You can rest now. Your loved one has been honored in a way that is profound. And to the extent that youre still wounded, suffering, questioning yourself, may you rest in peace yourself in this life, may you not have that trauma and that angst any longer.' Thats what I wish for all my friends here."
She continued, "So, Im proud to announce that after weeks of negotiating with the Legislature, we are now going to be making medical aid in dying available to New Yorkers going forward." Hochul reflected on the founding principles of the country, emphasizing individual rights and limited government. She acknowledged the moral implications of the decision, recognizing that some members of the faith community might not accept or understand her decision.
Hochul also addressed concerns about potential coercion or duress that could be applied to vulnerable individuals, such as the elderly or those with disabilities. She stated, "That there could be coercion, duress, and pressure put on people. And I was concerned about that and I said, 'How can we get out from under that?' That everyone will know that someone who makes that decision did it of free will, not under pressure. And so, those are some of the constraints I put around this."
She further emphasized the need for medical examination and confirmation of a patient's mental capacity to make such a decision. She also stressed that the legislation would only apply to those with a terminal prognosis of six months or less.
Hochul concluded, "But in doing so, I believe weve crafted an elegant solution to a problem that people have fought for, but also wrestled with for a long time. Because I want you to know, I did not arrive at this lightly. But my last thoughts were sitting at a funeral a Catholic funeral Saturday morning this past weekend. And I heard the priest talk about being called home to eternal life. And I realize were not talking about ending life early. Were about ending dying early, and so people can transition surrounded by family loved ones, not in a hospital bed with strangers at a time when they just slip away after grueling pain, sometimes just unbearable for a loved one to even witness. That to me is what dignitys all about."
The move by Governor Hochul places New York on a path similar to that of Canada, where assisted suicide was initially limited to terminal illness but has since expanded dramatically to include cases involving mental illness and disabilities. With this decision, New York is set to join 12 other states and Washington, D.C., that have already legalized medical aid in dying.
Critics argue that this puts the state on a slippery slope, with potentially far-reaching implications for the sanctity of life and the role of the state in determining its end.
Login