During a recent town hall event in Texas, Representative Jasmine Crockett unleashed a fervent critique of the Supreme Court, labeling it as "utterly trash" and advocating for its expansion.
The gathering, initially intended to address redistricting and election issues, quickly transformed into a platform for Crockett to promote court-packing legislation. Her remarks underscore a growing sentiment within the Democratic Party, aligning her with figures such as Adam Schiff and Elizabeth Warren, who have similarly championed the idea of expanding the Court.
According to Gateway Pundit, Crockett expressed her frustration with the current composition of the Supreme Court, asserting that it fails to produce decisions that align with Democratic policy objectives. She emphasized the need for reform, arguing that expansion is crucial to achieving desired outcomes. Notably absent from her discourse was a constitutional rationale for such changes; instead, Crockett focused on the Court's perceived reluctance to act in accordance with her political views.
Crockett's comments reflect a shift within the Democratic grassroots, where the notion of court-packing has gained traction. What was once considered a fringe proposal, particularly following the confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, has now become a mainstream position among national Democrats. Crockett's rhetoric highlights the party's increasing willingness to reshape the judiciary in response to unfavorable rulings.
During the town hall, Crockett also recounted a convoluted narrative surrounding a 2021 Texas redistricting lawsuit. She accused state officials of racially motivated tactics aimed at diluting minority voting power. Crockett detailed her involvement in the case, alleging that state attorneys underestimated her capabilities due to preconceived biases, which she attributed to their consumption of conservative media.
Her argument relied on numerical assertions that appeared inconsistent, including the claim that 39% of Texans would control over 70% of congressional seats. Crockett concluded that the redistricting maps were inherently racist based on this calculation, overlooking broader legal and demographic considerations. She further contended that shifting deadlines and map alterations amounted to voter suppression, asserting that such confusion disproportionately affects minority voters.
Crockett placed blame on Republicans, state judges, and the Supreme Court for the protracted litigation process, interpreting the Court's hesitance to intervene as evidence of partisan bias. She warned that without immediate action, the battle over redistricting could persist for years.
The overarching theme of the town hall was clear: Crockett's vision for the Supreme Court is one that aligns with Democratic policy preferences. When the Court fails to meet these expectations, she dismisses it as "trash" and calls for its expansion. By aligning herself with prominent Democrats like Schiff and Warren, Crockett signals that court-packing is no longer a marginal idea but a central objective for her party.
Login