In a stunning turn of events, the case against President Donald Trump and 18 others, which was initially framed as an organized crime ring under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, has been dismissed entirely.
The case was spearheaded by Fani Willis, who, in 2023, was seemingly working in tandem with other Democrats to wage legal warfare against Trump. However, the case soon began to unravel amidst a series of scandals.
As reported by WND, Willis' lover, whom she had employed using taxpayer funds to construct the charges, was ordered to step down from the case. Subsequently, Willis herself was removed from the case, followed by her entire office. The case was then handed over to Pete Skandalakis, the chief of the Georgia Prosecuting Attorneys Council. Unable to find another prosecutor willing to take on Willis' contentious claims, Skandalakis took it upon himself to oversee the prosecution.
Skandalakis shed light on the extent of Willis' failure, which was merely a fragment of the Democrats' organized legal assault against Trump. This assault has now been exposed as having reached the upper echelons of the Barack Obama administration, involving covert federal government surveillance of private phone calls of several Congress members. The entire operation was sparked by an orchestrated attempt by the unsuccessful Hillary Clinton campaign to falsely link Trump to Russia.
Skandalakis stated, The criminal conduct alleged in the Atlanta Judicial Circuits prosecution was conceived in Washington, D.C., not the State of Georgia. The federal government is the appropriate venue for this prosecution, not the State of Georgia. Indeed, if Special Counsel Jack Smith, with all the resources of the federal government at his disposal, after reviewing the evidence in this case and considering the U.S. Supreme Courts decision in Trump v. United States, along with the years of litigation such a case would inevitably entail, concluded that prosecution would be fruitless, then I too find that, despite the available evidence, pursuing the prosecution of all those involved in State of Georgia v. Donald Trump, et al. on essentially federal grounds would be equally unproductive.
Skandalakis subsequently filed a 22-page Motion to Nolle Prosequi, a Latin term indicating the prosecutor's unwillingness to proceed with the case. This led to the removal of Willis and her office from the case.
The case has been marred by scandal after scandal in Georgia. Willis had employed her lover to assist in building the case, spending hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars on him. The pair reportedly went on lavish vacations together, with Willis asserting she repaid him her portion in cash. Eventually, the courts ordered Willis' lover off the case, and an appeals ruling later determined that Willis and her office were tainted by apparent conflicts of interest and had to be removed.
The Washington Examiner reported that the "sweeping racketeering" case had been shrouded in uncertainty for weeks. Steve Sadow, Trump's representative, had called for the case to be dropped. This politically charged prosecution has to come to an end, he stated in an interview with the Washington Examiner. We remain confident that a fair and impartial review will lead to a dismissal of the case against President Trump.
The case alleged that Trump and others attempted to overturn the states 2020 presidential election. Skandalakis confessed that no other prosecutors were willing to take on the charges. Willis had named Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and a lengthy list of political aides, lawyers, and Republican electors as co-defendants.
The dismissal of this case underscores the importance of impartiality and integrity in legal proceedings, particularly those involving high-profile political figures. It serves as a stark reminder of the potential misuse of power and the necessity for accountability in our legal and political systems.
Login