In a striking display of political paradox, some of the Senate's most vocal Democratic critics of the government shutdown have swiftly transitioned into the most fervent opponents of the agreement to terminate it.
This group includes Senators Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont who aligns with Democrats, and John Hickenlooper, a Democrat from Colorado. These lawmakers had previously lambasted Republicans for allegedly depriving low-income families of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits and causing health care premiums to surge.
Several others, including Ed Markey of Massachusetts, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, and Mazie Hirono of Hawaii, have claimed that the "cruelty is the point."
According to The Washington Free Beacon, these same legislators are now denouncing an agreement that eight senators, who caucus with Democrats, reached with the GOP to reopen the government. This would allow SNAP payments to continue. The proposal, which made headway in the Senate on Sunday night, would finance the government until January 30, provide partial funding for essential services, and reverse some federal layoffs.
Republicans also consented to a vote on extending the Affordable Care Act subsidies due to expire at the end of December, a concept that was not initially part of the deal.
"TRUMP IS LYING AND MANUFACTURING A HUNGER CRISIS. No president in history has cut off SNAP during a shutdown. Including Trump in his first term," Senator Schumer declared on October 29. He also accused the president of "manufacturing a hunger crisis to bludgeon the American people so he doesn't have to fix healthcare." However, when the Senate deal was presented, Schumer was prepared to prolong the shutdown, stating, "This bill does nothing to ensure that that crisis is addressed. I am voting no, and I will keep fighting."
Sanders, on October 30, criticized Trump's actions, stating, "Trump's massive cuts to Medicaid and the ACA will cost an estimated 50,000 lives a year. Now he's refusing to release funds for SNAP, cutting off food aid to 42 million kids, parents, and grandparents in the richest country on Earth." He added, "Tax breaks for billionaires. Cuts for hungry kids." Following the deal's progress in the Senate, Sanders labeled the agreement "a very, very bad vote."
Hickenlooper, on October 2, accused Republicans of gleefully slashing SNAP benefits for over half a million Coloradans, stating, "Children and families are going to go hungry because of their Big Beautiful Betrayal." After voting against the deal, he expressed his frustration, stating, "We gave them every chance to negotiate."
Elizabeth Warren, on November 3, criticized Trump's response to the crisis, stating, "Health insurance premiums are spiking. SNAP food benefits are delayed. Many federal workers are not getting paid." After the Senate moved to end the shutdown, Warren labeled the deal as a mistake, adding, "While Trump and Republicans inflict pain on people, Democrats' most important job is to fight back."
Markey, on November 1, criticized Trump's indifference to the plight of American families, stating, "Last night, Trump celebrated with tuxedos and champagne while American families woke up to the reality of skyrocketing health care costs and no SNAP funds for food." His response to the proposed measure was a resolute, "No health care, no deal."
This political flip-flopping raises questions about the true motivations of these senators. While they were quick to condemn the shutdown and its effects on the American people, their opposition to a deal that would alleviate these issues suggests a deeper political game at play.
Their actions serve as a reminder that in the world of politics, the line between advocacy and opportunism can often blur.
Login