In a recent development, a federal appeals court has directed a lower court to revisit its decision to maintain President Donald Trump's ongoing case concerning his hush money conviction within the state court jurisdiction.
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals, represented by a three-judge panel, opined that the federal judge overlooked "important issues relevant" to Trump's plea to transfer the New York case to a federal court. In the federal court, Trump could potentially seek dismissal of the case based on presidential immunity.
The panel, comprising Judges Susan L. Carney, Raymond J. Lohier Jr., and Myrna Prez, delivered their ruling following the hearing of arguments in June. As reported by Fox News, Trump's legal team invoked a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity to bolster their case. A spokesperson for Trump's legal team stated, "President Trump continues to win in his fight against Radical Democrat Lawfare.
The Supreme Courts historic decision on Immunity, the Federal and New York State Constitutions, and other established legal precedent mandate that the Witch Hunt perpetrated by the Manhattan DA be immediately overturned and dismissed."
U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, appointed by President Bill Clinton, had previously rejected Trump's requests to shift the case twice. These rejections followed Trump's indictment in March 2023 and his conviction in May 2024.
The Supreme Court later ruled that presidents and former presidents cannot be prosecuted for official acts. Despite pleading not guilty to all 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree, Trump was found guilty after an unprecedented six-week criminal trial in New York.
The crux of Thursday's decision revolved around Hellerstein's ruling, which stated that Trump's lawyers had not met the high burden of proof required for changing jurisdiction. Furthermore, it was noted that Trumps conviction for falsifying business records pertained to his personal life, not official actions that the Supreme Court had deemed immune from prosecution. The appeals court panel criticized Hellersteins ruling for failing to "consider whether certain evidence admitted during the state court trial relates to immunized official acts or, if so, whether evidentiary immunity transformed."
Trump's legal team contended that former presidents should be tried in federal court for charges related to their time in office. However, Steven Wu, the appellate chief for the Manhattan District Attorneys Office, which prosecuted Trump, argued that the president was too late in seeking to move the case to federal court. Such a request is typically required within 30 days of an arraignment, barring exceptions for "good cause," which Hellerstein ruled was not demonstrated in this case.
In an extensive 111-page appeal filed in New York Supreme Courts Appellate Division in October, Trump's lawyers also argued that Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over the case in which Trump was convicted, refused to recuse himself from the case. They questioned his impartiality due to his past political contributions, including donations to then-President Joe Biden and a group called "Stop Republicans PAC."
They also raised concerns about Merchans daughters role as the President and part-owner of an advertising company that received millions from the Kamala Harris campaign and other Democrats.
While the legal battle continues, the question remains whether the case will be moved to federal court, potentially opening the door for Trump's legal team to seek dismissal based on presidential immunity.
Login