Watch: Chicago Mayor Laughs Off Hypothetical Question About Deporting Illegal Immigrant

Written by Published

In a recent press conference, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson found himself in a precarious position when confronted with a hypothetical scenario involving an illegal immigrant committing a violent crime.

The situation unfolded as reporter William Kelly posed a challenging question to Johnson, asking if he would support the deportation of an illegal alien who hypothetically assaulted and raped his wife. Johnson, who has been a vocal opponent of President Donald Trump's initiatives to address the issue of violent illegal aliens in Chicago, chose not to provide a direct answer.

According to the Western Journal, Kelly referenced a recent incident involving an illegal immigrant from Nicaragua who attacked and raped a woman on the street. He pressed Johnson, asking, "If that had been your wife, Stacie, would you want ICE to deport that illegal alien? Yes or no?"

Johnson deflected the question with a sarcastic remark about Kelly's YouTube viewership, to which Kelly retorted that his social media presence was more substantial than the mayor's. Despite Kelly's insistence, Johnson remained evasive, prompting Kelly to conclude, "No? Okay, thats the answer."

Kelly further criticized Johnson for what he described as frivolous race-baiting, highlighting the frustration among minority communities in Chicago. "The real Chicagoans that I talk to, that I communicate with mostly black and brown, actually tell me that you dont seem to know the difference between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens," Kelly stated.

He accused Johnson of prioritizing illegal immigrants over the city's residents, a sentiment echoed by many who feel neglected by their leadership.

Johnson's stance on immigration and crime has been a point of contention, particularly in light of his opposition to President Trump's proposal to deploy the National Guard to combat crime in Chicago. Johnson has labeled this move as racist, a claim that has drawn criticism given his own controversial remarks about hiring practices.

Johnson is currently under federal investigation for admitting a preference for hiring black individuals, whom he described as the "most generous race" on Earth.

This pattern of accusations and deflections is not uncommon among Democratic leaders, who often project their own biases onto their opponents. As Kelly pointed out, Johnson and his Democratic allies appear to prioritize the interests of illegal immigrants over those of law-abiding American citizens.

This approach, Kelly argues, poses a threat to the nation's security and stability, as it risks transforming the United States into a haven for unvetted illegal immigrants who may not share the country's values.

The broader implications of this issue are significant, as it raises questions about the balance between compassion for immigrants and the responsibility to protect citizens. The debate over immigration and crime continues to be a polarizing topic, with strong opinions on both sides.

As the conversation unfolds, it remains crucial to consider the impact of policies on both the safety of American communities and the nation's commitment to its foundational principles.