The recent assassination of Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative figure, has sparked a heated debate over the origins of political violence in the United States.
Critics on the right argue that the majority of such violence emanates from the left, a claim that has been met with fierce resistance from left-leaning factions. In an attempt to counter this narrative, some have resorted to inflating statistics to suggest that right-wing extremists are the primary culprits.
An article published by The Economist on September 12th, for instance, stated that "extremists on both left and right commit violence, although more incidents appear to come from right-leaning attackers." However, the credibility of this claim is questionable, as the data used in the article was "largely compiled by researchers whom sceptical conservatives would probably dismiss as biased," according to The Economist.
The source of this data, The Prosecution Project, is an organization that claims to track and analyze felony criminal cases involving illegal political violence, terrorism, and extremism in the United States since 1990. The founder and executive director of the Prosecution Project is Michael Loadenthal, an individual who has been described as an "openly anarchist Antifa-affiliated researcher at the University of Cincinnati who, by his own admission, is a far-left violent extremist," as reported by The Federalist in 2023.
The reliance on an Antifa-affiliated researcher to determine the extent of right-wing extremism raises serious concerns about bias. It's akin to asking a vegetarian to judge the humanity of meat eaters - the inherent bias would likely lead to a skewed perspective.
The Prosecution Project's data includes cases such as the January 2024 charges against John Reardon of Massachusetts, who made antisemitic threats against synagogues and the Israeli Consulate. Although the Department of Justice did not identify Reardon's political affiliation, The Prosecution Project labeled his crimes as "rightist" due to their "identity-focused" nature.
This is despite the fact that Reardon's actions appear to have been influenced by pro-Palestine sentiments, a cause typically associated with Democrats.
The Prosecution Project's data also includes charges against Edmee Chavannes under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, despite Chavannes being found not guilty. The inclusion of such cases, along with incidents as minor as the posting of racist stickers, raises questions about the validity of the data and its use in assessing the prevalence of political violence.
The Federalist has previously reported on the progressive anti-abortion movement and the left's Marxist oppressor-versus-oppressed framework, both of which demonstrate that issues such as race and abortion are not exclusive to the right. Yet, these complexities are often overlooked in the data, leading to a distorted view of political violence in the United States.
A similar bias can be seen in a study by Alex Nowrasteh at the Cato Institute, which was debunked by Amber Duke at The Daily Caller. Nowrasteh's study claimed that politically motivated violence is rare in the U.S., but when it does occur, "right-wing terrorists" are more often to blame.
However, this conclusion was reached by excluding significant events such as the 9/11 attacks and the assassination attempts on President Donald Trump.
The Anti-Defamation League has also produced a study claiming that the right is responsible for increased political violence. However, this study has been criticized for its glaring omissions, such as the murder of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
The manipulation of data to fit a particular narrative is not only misleading but also dismissive of the real impact of political violence. The assassination of Charlie Kirk, for example, has sent shockwaves through conservative communities across the nation, an impact that is not reflected in these studies.
The ripple effect of such a crime extends far beyond the immediate victim, affecting countless individuals and communities. The refusal of many members of Congress to condemn the assassination is a stark reminder of the deep political divisions in the country.
If the true measure of political violence is its impact on society, then it is clear that the left's role in such violence cannot be downplayed or ignored.
Login