The View Co-Host Left Terrified After Justice Sotomayors Response About Trump Eyeing A Third Term!

Written by Published

During a recent episode of "The View: Behind The Table" podcast, co-host Sunny Hostin expressed her unease following an interview with Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

The conversation revolved around the possibility of President Donald Trump pursuing a third term in office, a notion that Hostin found unsettling due to Sotomayor's remarks. Although the justice acknowledged that the 22nd Amendment prohibits a third term, she pointed out that this provision has never been legally challenged, a statement that Hostin found particularly alarming.

According to Fox News, Hostin shared her concerns, stating, "It scared me," in response to Sotomayor's comments. The justice emphasized that the Constitution should be regarded as the supreme law of the land, a sentiment that Hostin found troubling, especially after co-host Joy Behar remarked on Trump's tendency to disregard established rules.

This discussion comes in the wake of President Trump's previous hints at the possibility of seeking a third term. In a March 2025 interview with NBC News, Trump mentioned, "A lot of people want me to do it," while acknowledging that it was still early in his administration.

The topic of a potential third term for Trump was further explored during an episode of the ABC daytime talk show, where co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin questioned Sotomayor on the matter. Griffin expressed her belief that the Republican Party might support such a move, despite the 22nd Amendment's clear prohibition.

Sotomayor responded by affirming the Constitution as settled law, yet noted the absence of any legal challenges to this specific issue. "No one has tried to challenge that. Until somebody tries, you dont know," she stated, underscoring the lack of precedent.

Hostin elaborated on her apprehensions during the podcast, highlighting the unusual nature of Sotomayor's response. "Supreme Court justices are usually very reluctant and guarded to say they don't say much," she explained. Hostin found the justice's acknowledgment of the untested nature of the 22nd Amendment particularly disconcerting.

When Behar interjected, asking if the response was vague, Hostin clarified, "No, it wasnt vague. I thought it was pretty clear. She said it hadnt been tested yet. Theres no case."

Behar further commented on Trump's approach to governance, suggesting that his actions often defy constitutional norms. "Anything that he does that overwhelms or overtakes anything thats in the Constitution cause he doesnt follow the rules. And it hasnt been done before. No one has done any of the things that he has done," she remarked.

The discussion raises important questions about the resilience of constitutional provisions and the potential for unprecedented challenges. While the 22nd Amendment explicitly limits presidential terms, the absence of judicial scrutiny leaves room for speculation. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the durability of constitutional safeguards remains a topic of significant interest and concern.