Musk TORCHES Liberal Media For Turning A Blind Eye After Cory Booker Does THIS!

Written by Published

In a recent event that has sparked controversy, Democratic Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey was seen making a gesture during his speech at the California Democratic Party's 2025 state convention in Anaheim.

The gesture, which involved Booker pressing his hand to his heart before extending it in a salute to the crowd, was eerily similar to one made by Elon Musk during a speech in January. However, the reactions to these identical gestures have been markedly different, highlighting a potential double standard.

According to The Blaze, when Musk made the same gesture during his speech following President Donald Trump's second inauguration at the Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C., it was met with widespread criticism from Democrats and liberal media outlets.

Musk's gesture was characterized as a Nazi salute, leading to calls for apologies and denouncements. "Fate loves irony, but hates hypocrisy," Musk noted, responding to the selective outrage over his gesture.

In his January speech, Musk, who has publicly acknowledged having Asperger's, a syndrome on the autism spectrum, expressed his excitement over Trump's victory. "This was no ordinary victory. This was a fork in the road of human civilization," Musk declared. "This one really mattered. Thank you for making it happen!" He then made the gesture that would later be scrutinized, stating, "My heart goes out to you."

The reaction to Musk's gesture was swift and severe. Rep. Dan Goldman, a Democrat from New York, argued that Musk's salute could only be interpreted as a Seig Heil salute, synonymous with Nazi support for Hitler. Goldman called for an immediate apology from Musk and a denouncement from President Trump. Other Democrats, including Sen. Chris Murphy and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, echoed these sentiments, further fueling the narrative that Musk had made a Nazi salute.

However, not all agreed with this interpretation. The Anti-Defamation League, for instance, stated that Musk "made an awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm, not a Nazi salute." The ADL urged for grace and the benefit of the doubt in such situations.

Fast forward to Booker's speech at the California convention, where he made a similar gesture. "Real change does not come from Washington. It comes from communities. It comes from the streets," Booker passionately told the crowd. "It comes from the people who's standing up and have shown over and over again against the powerful, against the elected, against the rich that the power of the people is greater than the people in power."

Despite the striking similarity between Booker's and Musk's gestures, the reaction to Booker's salute was noticeably muted. Critics have pointed out this discrepancy, suggesting that the lack of outrage over Booker's gesture is indicative of hypocrisy and double standards. For instance, Libs of TikTok noted that Newsweek had previously accused Musk of keeping the fascist salute alive, but portrayed Booker as a man wrongfully accused.

Musk himself responded to the controversy, stating, "Legacy media like Newsweek lie relentlessly." Other critics, such as former nuclear scientist for the Department of Energy Matt Van Swol, pointed out the lack of coverage of Booker's salute by major news networks, despite their extensive coverage of Musk's gesture.

In response to the controversy, a spokeswoman for Booker told Forbes that Booker was merely waving to the crowd, and any comparison to Musk's gesture was made in bad faith. However, critics remain unconvinced, arguing that the gestures were virtually identical and that the disparate reactions reveal a troubling double standard.

As this controversy unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the importance of consistency in media coverage and the dangers of selective outrage. It also raises questions about the role of personal bias in shaping narratives and the need for a more balanced approach to reporting.

As Musk himself noted, "Fate loves irony, but hates hypocrisy." It seems that this sentiment is more relevant than ever in today's polarized political climate.