Al Gore's Latest "Net-Zero" Prediction Sparks Controversy And Criticism

Written by Published

Al Gore, a prominent figure in the global warming debate, has made a fresh prediction about climate change, stating that temperatures will cease to rise almost immediately once we achieve "true net zero."

The concept of net-zero emissions, often criticized as a guise for global communism, implies a complete eradication of carbon emissions, a move that critics argue would catapult us back to the dark ages.

Speaking from Davos amidst freezing temperatures and a snowy landscape, Gore asserted, "The good news is that once we get to true net zero and stop adding, the temperatures will stop going up almost immediately, with a lag of as little as three years." However, he did not provide any concrete evidence to substantiate this new timeline.

He further elaborated, "And if we stay at true net zero half of the human cause to greenhouse gas pollution will fall out of the atmosphere in as little as 25 to 30 years, but getting there is very tough."

Gore's predictions have been met with skepticism in the past. On December 13, 2008, he made a bold claim to a German audience that the entire North Polar Ice Cap would vanish in five years. This prediction, reported by The Gateway Pundit, marked the beginning of global warming hysteria.

Notably, this was not the only time Gore made such a prediction. He had been forecasting this dire scenario since 2007, implying that the North Pole should have melted completely over a decade ago.

Gore made a similar prediction in 2009. However, at least eight of the dire predictions from Gore's movie have not come to fruition. Despite this, Gore continues to be given a platform to express his views and make one prediction after another. Critics argue that this only serves to fuel fear and uncertainty, without providing any substantial solutions to the pressing issue of climate change.