Instacart Hit With $5 Million Project Firewall Crackdown After DOJ Says It Sidelined U.S. Workers

Written by Published

Popular grocery delivery platform Instacart has agreed to pay millions of dollars to resolve federal allegations that it systematically sidelined American workers in favor of foreign labor.

According to Fox News, the Department of Justices Civil Rights Division announced a $5 million settlement with Maplebear Inc., Instacarts parent company, following an investigation into hiring practices that allegedly violated the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Federal officials say the agreement addresses claims that Instacart purposefully discriminated against U.S. and American workers based on country of origin, a charge that strikes at the heart of long-standing concerns about corporations gaming immigration and labor rules to undercut domestic workers.

At the center of the case is the federal Permanent Labor Certification (PERM) program, a process meant to ensure that employers make a genuine effort to recruit American workers before turning to foreign nationals for permanent positions. The Justice Department contends that Instacart abused this system by imposing unusual and onerous requirements on U.S. applicants, allegedly forcing them to submit applications by physical mail rather than through the companys standard electronic system, in a practice said to have run from December 2023 through February 2026.

By creating a separate, more cumbersome path for American candidates, the company allegedly tilted the playing field in favor of foreign workers on temporary visas, undermining the very purpose of the PERM safeguards. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon underscored the broader significance of the case, declaring, This significant resolution marks the 15th settlement agreement the Civil Rights Division has reached under my leadership to protect U.S. workers, and adding, Our record demonstrates that the Justice Department is holding companies who prefer workers with temporary employment visas accountable. We will not stop fighting for U.S. workers until there is a fair playing field.

The settlement, reached in coordination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), requires Instacart to establish a $4 million fund to compensate affected applicants and to pay an additional $1 million in civil penalties. For a company valued in the billions, the financial hit is modest, but the enforcement action sends a clear message to corporate America that exploiting immigration channels at the expense of citizens and lawful permanent residents will draw federal scrutiny.

Under the PERM framework, employers are obligated to make a good-faith effort to recruit U.S. workers before sponsoring foreign employees for permanent residence. The Justice Department emphasized that companies may not impose additional burdens for U.S. and American workers; publishing job advertisements that disfavor, limit, specify, or otherwise discriminate against U.S. and American workers; or use processes that limit, segregate, or classify applicants in any way that tends to deprive U.S. and American applicants of employment opportunities, a standard that Instacart is accused of flouting.

The Instacart case marks the 15th such settlement since President Donald Trump began his second term in January 2025, reflecting a sustained federal push to prioritize American workers in the labor market. The EEOC has branded this broader enforcement initiative Project Firewall, signaling an intent to erect firm legal barriers against discriminatory hiring schemes that sideline citizens in favor of cheaper or more easily controlled foreign labor.

Todays settlement makes clear that when employers erect unlawful barriers that harm American workers, the EEOC will act decisively, EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas said, stressing the agencys resolve. The EEOC is committed to holding companies accountable when they deny equal work opportunities to U.S. workers by preferring temporary visa holders for jobs. Discrimination against workers based on their American national origin has no place in our economy.

Instacart, for its part, has publicly defended its overall employment record while expressing a desire to move past the dispute. We're proud to be a U.S.-based grocery technology platform, employing thousands of American workers and serving millions of customers, retailers, shoppers and brands. We encourage qualified U.S. jobseekers to apply to join our team, a company spokesperson told Fox News Digital.

The spokesperson further insisted that the companys policies were lawful, even as it agreed to the settlement. Hiring and investing in American workers across our U.S. business is our priority, and we actively promote every role across many channels to ensure qualified U.S. candidates are always first in line for opportunities. While we maintain that our practices complied with all applicable laws and regulations, were pleased to have resolved this matter so we can keep our full focus on delivering on our mission for customers, shoppers, retailers and brands.

For conservatives who have long warned that big business often uses complex immigration and labor programs to bypass American workers, the Instacart case will likely be seen as further validation of those concerns. With Project Firewall and similar efforts continuing under the Trump administration, which has made protecting U.S. workers a central promise, companies that rely heavily on foreign labor will face growing pressure to prove they are not sacrificing American opportunity on the altar of convenience and cost-cutting.