President Donald Trumps administration is reportedly preparing a legal case that could revoke Democratic Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omars U.S. citizenship, potentially making her the most prominent target yet in a broader denaturalization campaign.
According to Western Journal, the move follows an early-morning raid Monday on Omars Washington, D.C., residence, during which federal agents seized her phone and other documents as part of an investigation into alleged fraud in her naturalization process. At the center of the probe is an accusation that Omar used a falsified birthdate on her citizenship paperwork, a detail that could determine whether she was eligible to derive citizenship automatically through her father or was required to apply independently as an adult.
Omar became a naturalized citizen in 2000 and claimed at the time that she was still a minor, a status that would have allowed her to obtain citizenship through her fathers naturalization. However, her publicly listed birthdate would have made her at least 18 years old at the time, raising questions about whether she misrepresented her age to secure an immigration benefit. If she were 18 or older, federal law would have required her to file her own application, subjecting her to additional scrutiny and separate eligibility requirements.
Investigators now allege that Omar subsequently altered her official birth year to 1982, a change that would align with her claim of being underage when her father became a citizen. Omar has previously asserted that her birth records were destroyed during her familys flight from war-torn Somalia, a common claim among refugees but one that complicates verification of her identity and age. The Trump administration has already launched a broader initiative to identify and denaturalize individuals who lied on their applications, and The Wall Street Journal reported that Omar could become the highest-profile and most controversial part of that effort.
As part of the operation, federal authorities have also issued subpoenas to members of Omars family, including her sister, signaling that investigators are examining a wider network of potential misrepresentations. Today in the Washington, D.C., area, Homeland Security Investigations executed a judicially authorized search warrant secured by the Department of Justice, the Justice Department said in a statement on Monday following the raid. This enforcement action is part of an ongoing federal investigation.
Omar has publicly insisted that the raid and the broader inquiry are politically motivated, portraying the operation as an attempt to silence a vocal progressive critic of the president. Yet a federal judge in Washington, D.C., approved the warrant, and a source familiar with the case told the media there was compelling evidence of a federal crime. The Wall Street Journals reporting marked the first clear indication that the administration is considering making Omar the flagship case in its denaturalization push, a move that would undoubtedly inflame partisan tensions.
The same report described the probe as a multipronged effort both on the congresswoman and actions of her deceased father, suggesting that investigators are scrutinizing the familys entire immigration history. That angle gained further traction after a New York Post report on Tuesday alleged that Omars late father had served as a military commander for Somalias former regime, a role that would have rendered him ineligible for asylum under U.S. law. Nur Said was a military officer who was loyal to the regime until the end, Oxford University academic Mohamed Haji Ingiriis told the outlet.
He was part and parcel of those who caused and created the mayhem they fled to live comfortably in the United States. Ingiriis went further, arguing that Omars father should never have been granted refuge on American soil. He only fled when the dictatorship fell in 1991, Ingiriis added. He was the beneficiary of the military regime and should not have been given asylum whatsoever.
While the investigation has been unfolding for some time, Trump has maintained that he did not personally single out Omar as a target, even as he has not concealed his disdain for her politics and conduct. Ive always found her to be totally crooked, personally, Trump said after the raid on Monday. But that has nothing to do with me. I think shes a terrible person, just a complainer.
She comes from a country that is a non-country, he added. And then she comes over here and she complains about our Constitution. I think shes a terrible person. For many conservatives, the case underscores long-standing concerns about lax vetting in the refugee and asylum systems, as well as the willingness of some on the left to exploit Americas generosity while denigrating its founding principles.
If the Justice Department proceeds and proves that Omar or her family lied on immigration forms, the congresswoman could face denaturalization and potential removal proceedings, an extraordinary outcome for a sitting member of Congress. At the same time, the case raises broader questions about how many others may have gamed the system, and whether past administrations turned a blind eye in the name of political correctness and expansive refugee policies. For an administration that has emphasized the rule of law, border security, and the integrity of citizenship, Omars situation may become a defining test of whether the United States is prepared to hold even powerful officeholders accountable to the same standards as every other immigrant.
Login