Once again, Democrats are sounding the alarm about stolen elections this time led by Vice President Kamala Harris, who is now openly accusing Republicans of cheating in contests that have not even occurred.
Speaking during a visit to Seoul, South Korea, Harris confidently predicted sweeping Democratic victories in November while simultaneously alleging that the GOP is engaged in systemic election manipulation. According to Western Journal, the vice president told her foreign audience that Republicans are undermining American democracy even as she insisted her party would prevail at the ballot box.
We are facing a lot of obstacles, but the Democrats are going to win. I believe certainly the House and each day presents a new reason to think that of winning the Senate as well, she said, according to The Korea Times. In other words, Democrats are guaranteed victory unless, of course, Republicans cheat, a narrative that conveniently insulates her party from accountability if voters choose a different direction.
Harris then shifted to a familiar progressive talking point: blaming information itself. I believe we are in a very difficult environment. AI contributes to, for example, vast amounts of mis- and disinformation, Harris said.
The vice presidents complaint about mis- and disinformation echoes years of Democratic efforts to police speech online, often under the guise of combating fake news. Yet the same officials who once insisted that questioning election outcomes was a grave threat to democracy now appear comfortable casting doubt on future results when it suits their political interests.
There have been overt attempts to deny fair and free elections, as we all know, she continued. In the United States, theres been overt cheating happening around the elections process, whether it be the purging of the voter rolls or redrawing districts outside of the season when that would happen. These are serious accusations, delivered on foreign soil, and aimed squarely at Republican-led states that have pursued routine voter-roll maintenance and redistricting within the bounds of state law.
This is hardly the first time Harris has leaned into preemptive election delegitimization. We have to win these midterms. These folks are cheating, Harris told former soccer star Megan Rapinoe on her podcast in September, according to The Washington Times.
The message is unmistakable: if Democrats win, the system worked; if they lose, it was rigged. That posture mirrors the rhetoric Democrats once claimed was uniquely dangerous when it came from Republicans who questioned the integrity of the 2020 election, yet it now appears to be acceptable when deployed by the sitting vice president.
Harris remarks also highlight a broader double standard in how political speech is judged. When conservatives raise concerns about election procedures, they are branded election deniers and accused of undermining the republic. When a top Democrat alleges overt cheating and impugns routine election administration, the same media and political establishment largely look the other way.
By taking this narrative overseas, Harris has effectively told a key American ally that the United States is riddled with electoral corruption whenever Republicans are in charge of the process. That is a remarkable stance for a vice president who campaigned on restoring norms and trust in institutions. It also raises a basic question: if she truly believes the system is so compromised, why does her party continue to insist that recent elections were the most secure and safest in history?
For conservatives, the episode underscores how election denialism has become a partisan cudgel rather than a principled standard. The same behavior that was likened to an attack on democracy when associated with Jan. 6 is now tolerated, even encouraged, when it comes from a Democrat anticipating unfavorable results. If Democrats are unwilling to hold their own leaders to the rules they demand of their opponents, Americans are justified in viewing their rhetoric about protecting democracy as little more than a political tactic.
Login