The personal scandal surrounding former Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema has escalated into a criminal case after her ex-bodyguard and admitted lover was charged with a felony for allegedly breaking into her Cave Creek home and causing more than $200,000 in damage.
The saga, which blends moral failure with legal jeopardy, now includes serious property crimes tied to a man Sinema once trusted with her safety. According to The Gateway Pundit, Sinema acknowledged in sworn court filings that her relationship with 39-year-old Matthew Ammel turned romantic and intimate in May 2024, while she was still in the U.S. Senate and while he remained married, detailing encounters in Sonoma/Napa, New York City, Washington, D.C., Aspen, and Phoenix.
The affair came into public view when newly released text messages showed Ammels then-wife, Heather Ammel, confronting the senator directly: Are you having an affair with my husband? You took a married man away from his family. Heather has since filed a lawsuit under North Carolinas alienation-of-affection statute, accusing Sinema of destroying a 14-year marriage, a legal remedy that reflects a more traditional view of marital fidelity and accountability.
Earlier this month, a federal judge in North Carolina refused to dismiss that lawsuit, a significant setback for Sinemas legal strategy. The court found that Sinemas testimony has not been credible on several points and allowed the so-called homewrecker case to move forward, underscoring the seriousness of the allegations against a politician who once campaigned on integrity and independence.
Ammel, a retired Army veteran who joined Sinemas security detail in 2022, is portrayed in court records as a troubled veteran with brain injuries who struggled after leaving the military. Rather than maintaining professional boundaries, Sinemas campaign and related committees paid him more than $100,000 after she left office, while his ex-wife alleges the senator showered him with gifts, concert tickets, and even encouraged psychedelic drug use.
That already volatile mix has now spilled into alleged criminal conduct at Sinemas Arizona residence. The same man is accused of turning her Cave Creek home into a crime scene over a dispute involving a refused social-media post, a bizarre twist that highlights the risks when public officials blur personal and professional lines.
Authorities say Ammel was taken into custody last week and charged with criminal damage as a class 4 felony. According to court documents first reported by AZFamily, he allegedly entered Sinemas home on August 30 while she was out of town and demanded that she post a video to her X account.
When she refused, the situation allegedly escalated into threats and destruction. Ammel is accused of warning that he would destroy one of her paintings every 10 minutes until she complied, a threat Sinema did not yield to.
Investigators say Ammel then pulled about 22 paintings off the walls and threw them into her swimming pool, with one additional painting found near the front entrance, spray-painted. He also allegedly smashed expensive liquor bottles and hurled a glass bottle at a wall-mounted mirror, shattering it, with deputies later finding paintings floating in the pool and at the bottom.
The financial toll of the rampage is substantial. The artwork alone was valued at $123,015, and combined damage to the home and pool is estimated at more than $200,000, a staggering figure for what began as a demand for a social-media post.
Sinema provided investigators with text messages, recordings, and surveillance video to support the case. Deputies say the footage clearly identified Ammel, reinforcing the narrative that this was not a random break-in but a deeply personal dispute turned destructive.
He was ultimately picked up from a behavioral health facility after a petition for an involuntary psychiatric evaluation and booked on the damage charge. Ammel has since been released with an electronic monitor, with a preliminary hearing set for October 5, leaving Sinema to face not only a looming alienation-of-affection trial but also the political and moral fallout of a relationship that has spiraled into public spectacle during President Trumps second term, raising renewed questions about judgment, personal responsibility, and the standards Americans should demand from those who seek high office.
Login