CNN anchor Dana Bash was left visibly rattled on her own network after United Nations Ambassador Mike Waltz dismantled her criticism of President Donald Trumps decision to bar several left-leaning outlets from the White House.
According to The Gateway Pundit, President Trump announced on Truth Social that he had revoked access for CNN, MSNBC, and Politico over their relentless dissemination of FAKE NEWS. He promptly enforced the decision: reporters from the three organizations discovered their credentials had been deactivated when they attempted to enter the White House complex, and their press passes were subsequently confiscated.
Bash attempted to cast the move as authoritarian, even likening the Presidents actions to tactics used by Communist China. Waltz, however, countered by reminding viewers that The prior administration limited all kinds of journalistic outfits and journalists they had deemed right-wing, noting that these conservative outlets have only recently been allowed back onto the grounds.
He underscored that CNN and its peers showed no such outrage when the Biden administration sidelined conservative media, exposing a double standard that has long plagued corporate newsrooms. Waltz further argued that the President is justified in questioning the motives of outlets that appear more interested in political warfare than honest reporting, adding that the president doesnt believe others are acting in good faith.
Waltz then turned to the medias broader credibility crisis, blasting the practice of publishing sensational but dubious stories based on unnamed sources. I just saw one using anonymous sources referencing someone whos dead, he said, urging the press to Take a good, introspective look at itself and its practices, and condemning how it throws things out there, then puts a little baby correction nobody pays attention to, and it sticks to people like napalm.
He also invoked constitutional law to dismantle Bashs implication that the ban was an attack on the First Amendment. The Supreme Court has been very clear in multiple cases going back to the 1960s (regarding) your right to publish and speak rather than having access to any government facility, Waltz explained, making clear that access to the White House is a privilege, not an absolute right.
By the end of the exchange, Bash could offer little more than a stunned reaction, admitting, Im just at a loss for words, especially when the president decides he just doesnt want negative reporting. Her response only highlighted what conservatives have argued for years: establishment media are quick to cry authoritarianism when their own influence is checked, yet remain silent when government power is used to marginalize right-leaning voices.
Login