Hasan Piker Casually Explains How To Weaponize Drones On StreamResurfaced Clip Sparks New Outrage

Written by Published

Left-wing streamer Hasan Piker is again under fire after resurfaced footage showed him casually outlining how to buy and weaponize explosive drones while musing that suicide bombers are no longer necessary in modern warfare.

The remarks, originally made during a March 2026 Twitch broadcast, reappeared on X over the weekend and quickly reignited criticism of the self-described socialist commentator, according to Western Journal. Piker, who infamously declared that America deserved 9/11 during a 2019 livestream, has long been a darling of the online far left despite a record of statements that many Americans would regard as openly sympathetic to U.S. enemies.

In the newly resurfaced clip, Piker frames his comments around recent conflicts involving Islamist militants. I was thinking about this with, like, the Afghanistan Taliban-Pakistan fight that was taking place. And I was really thinking about this you really dont need suicide bombing anymore, you know? Piker said during the livestream after showing footage of Iranian Shahed drones, per a report from Mediaite.

He went on to contrast nuclear deterrence with terrorist tactics, suggesting that technology has made human bombers obsolete. Cause, like, the Taliban guy was like, Oh, you have nuclear arms, but we have suicide bombers. Like, well just blow up your country with suicide bombers. And its like, you really dont need that anymore in drone warfare, right? he continued.

Piker then shifted from commentary to what sounded uncomfortably close to practical instruction. You dont need that at all. Just make f***ing drones. You can purchase them from, you know, you can buy them in the online marketplace.

He did not stop at the idea level, instead describing how such devices could be outfitted for lethal use. Like, China literally sells explosive ordnance delivery mechanisms that you can put on a DJI drone that you purchase, like, at virtually no significant cost in comparison to, like, the sophisticated equipment that you need to put together, he described.

Piker even mocked the continued use of suicide bombers as a kind of nostalgic affectation. So um, I guess, like, at that point, youre doing that for the love of the game, right? Like, youre doing suicide bombing just for the love of the game because, like, you want to keep it old school? Is that what it is? Why is bro saying that? he asked.

He further speculated about what terrorists could get away with using relatively cheap Iranian-style drones. Im just saying its, like, insane that I mean, this is basically functionally what you could get away with if you facilitated, like, a somewhat good, difficult-to-pull-off suicide bombing strike, right? And instead, youre just using a Shahed drone thats, like, $10,000?

Mediaite noted that Piker has previously drawn outrage for favorable commentary on the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen and the Hezbollah terrorist organization in Lebanon. He made the America deserved 9/11 comment in a 2019 livestream, a remark that many on the left quietly excused even as families of the nearly 3,000 murdered Americans continue to seek justice.

Beyond his rhetoric praising or normalizing groups designated as terrorist organizations by the U.S. government, Piker has also faced criticism for his personal conduct. He garnered backlash for delivering an electric shock to his dog during an October 2025 livestream, behavior that would end the career of most public figures outside the insulated world of radical online influencers.

For many conservatives, the latest clip underscores a broader problem: a media and tech ecosystem that routinely censors traditional voices while allowing extremist, anti-American commentary to flourish so long as it comes from the left. At a time when President Trumps second administration is working to confront foreign terrorism and secure the homeland, the spectacle of a prominent online figure casually discussing how to optimize suicide attacks with drones raises serious questions about the moral compass of the progressive movement and the platforms that continue to profit from it.