Abdul El-Sayeds narrow victory in the Michigan Democratic senatorial primary is drawing praise from some corners that most mainstream candidates would rather not highlight.
According to Western Journal, one of the most effusive celebrations came from Ikhwan Online, an official media arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, which published a glowing article hailing El-Sayeds win as a blow to pro-Israel interests. The coverage follows mounting concerns from watchdogs and conservative groups about El-Sayeds proximity to organizations with documented ties to the Brotherhood, a movement founded in Egypt and designated as a terrorist organization by the United States and several allied governments.
On Wednesday, after El-Sayeds win over U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens was certified, Ikhwan Onlines report left little doubt about how the group views the outcome, even working in a congratulatory nod to squad member Rep. Rashida Tlaib for her own primary victory.
From a computer translation of the original Arabic text, the outlet wrote: The American doctor of Egyptian origin, Abdel Rahman Abdoul Al-Sayed, on Wednesday, snatched the Democratic Partys candidacy card to compete for the Michigan state seat in the US Senate midterm elections, in a result described as a new setback for pro-occupation lobby groups, after surpassing Rep. Hailey Stevens, supported by the American Zionist Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).
The article continued by framing El-Sayeds win as a defeat for pro-Israel advocacy in Washington, asserting that American media confirmed that Al-Sayed won the Democratic Party nomination after a fierce competition with Stevens, which received wide support from pro-occupation lobby groups, while US MP of Palestinian origin, Rashida Tlaib, achieved a new victory in the primaries of Michigans 12th District, according to the Associated Press.
It further described the race as a clash between Al-Sayed, a former public health official known for his progressive positions in support of Palestinian rights, and Stevens, a member of the House of Representatives for four consecutive sessions, which is one of the most prominent pro-occupation figures within the Democratic Party.
Commentators on the right have noted that Stevens has hardly been a nationally recognized figure, much less the prominent pro-occupation hawk portrayed by the Brotherhoods media arm, underscoring how far left activists now define anyone not aligned with the squad. Still, the rhetoric from Ikhwan Online leaves little ambiguity about its political lens, with the outlet running the triumphalist headline: Abdul Rahman al-Sayyid conquers the Zionists and runs for the Senate.
Republicans quickly seized on the Brotherhood-linked outlets enthusiasm, arguing that it reveals the radical elements cheering on the Democratic Partys progressive wing. GOP strategists and conservative commentators have already begun highlighting the article as evidence that El-Sayeds candidacy is celebrated by groups hostile to American allies and interests.
What remains unclear is whether the Ikhwan Online piece reflects any formal blessing or direction from Muslim Brotherhood leadership, or whether it is simply ideological cheerleading from a sympathetic media organ. Even so, the episode underscores what critics describe as an already problematic and uncomfortable closeness between El-Sayeds political operation and organizations long scrutinized for their Brotherhood ties.
In July, the Washington Free Beacon reported that El-Sayeds father-in-law, Tayeb Jukaku, a major donor to his campaign, has held senior roles in institutions flagged by federal prosecutors. Jukaku was identified as a leader in the Islamic Society of North America, which was named an unindicted co-conspirator in a 2007 terrorist financing case involving the funneling of money to extremist groups.
In court documents, prosecutors labeled ISNA one of several entities who are and/or were members of the US Muslim Brotherhood, the Free Beacon reported. Jukaku also served as the president of the Michigan chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, another Muslim Brotherhood-linked organization that was named as a co-conspirator in the 2007 case.
For many conservatives, these associations should be an albatross around El-Sayeds neck as he heads into a general election where national security, support for Israel, and the influence of radical Islam remain potent issues. Republican strategists argue that voters deserve to know why a Democratic Senate nominee is being celebrated by a movement that Western governments have formally designated as a terrorist organization.
The concerns have already reached Capitol Hill, where senior Republicans are sounding the alarm about the direction of the Democratic Party. At a Senate hearing on Wednesday, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz warned that the Democratic campaign machine is now openly embracing terrorist organizations waging war on America.
Behind El-Sayeds political rise sits a much older and more entrenched institutional network, Cruz added, alluding to the web of Islamist-linked organizations that have operated in the United States for decades under the banner of civil rights or religious advocacy.
For conservatives, that institutional network is not a footnote but a central question about who will hold power in Washington and whose interests they will serve.
The jubilant tone of Ikhwan Onlines coverage leaves little doubt that the Muslim Brotherhood views El-Sayeds ascent as a strategic win, not merely a local political story. And if alcohol wasnt haram, its clear from the article at Ikhwan Online that there would be champagne corks popping at Muslim Brotherhood headquarters all over the world, one commentator observed, capturing the sense of celebration among Islamist sympathizers watching the American left drift further from traditional pro-Israel, pro-Western positions.
Login