Michigans embattled Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson now finds herself at the center of yet another legal and ethical firestorm, this time over her past role with the scandal-plagued Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and fresh allegations of racial discrimination inside her own department.
According to Gateway Pundit, MCR Special Teams, working with the Mike Cox law firm, personally served Benson with SPLC-related legal papers, confronting the Democrat official as she appeared to be heading into a campaign event. The move comes just weeks after former Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox ended his bid for the Republican gubernatorial nomination, even as Benson, term-limited as Secretary of State and widely viewed by conservatives as a symbol of election mismanagement, is expected to be the Democrats leading contender for governor.
Benson, whom the Gateway Pundit has repeatedly labeled Americas most dishonest Secretary of State, is no stranger to the courtroom. She has been involved in 69 election-related lawsuits during her tenure, a staggering figure that exceeds the combined total of the previous four Michigan Secretaries of State and underscores the level of controversy that has followed her administration.
Now, in addition to the barrage of election-integrity lawsuits that have dogged her tenure, Benson faces a new line of scrutiny that could prove politically explosive. At issue is her service on the board of the Southern Poverty Law Center at the same time the organization stands accused in a federal case of funneling donor money to extremist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, for informant operations that allegedly helped sustain the very organizations the SPLC claimed to be fighting.
According to a federal indictment unsealed in April 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice has charged the Southern Poverty Law Center with wire fraud, false statements, and related offenses. Prosecutors allege that between roughly 2014 and 2023, the SPLC paid more than $3 millionlater described in some reports as over $4 millionin donor funds to individuals associated with extremist organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan, United Klans of America, National Alliance, National Socialist Movement, and others.
These payments, federal prosecutors say, were directed to informants the SPLC used to infiltrate or gather intelligence on these groups. The indictment further claims that some of the money was used by recipients for group-related activities, including, according to prosecutors, recruiting new members and purchasing materials such as Klan robes and items used in cross-burning ceremonies.
Prosecutors also allege that the SPLC failed to disclose these controversial payments to its donors, even as it continued to raise money on the premise that it was working to dismantle the very organizations it was secretly funding through informants. If proven, such conduct would represent not only a profound betrayal of donor trust but also a damning indictment of the SPLCs long-touted moral authority as a watchdog against hate.
The controversy reaches directly into Michigan politics because Benson sat on the SPLCs board during this period, including in 2017, when the nation was stunned by the violence at the Unite The Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. On August 12, 2017, Americans watched in horror as what had been billed as a rally to defend historic statuesmany of which had come under attack during the Obama yearsdescended into chaos and bloodshed.
The rally, which drew a mix of right-wing demonstrators, white nationalists, and counter-protesters, culminated in the tragic death of Heather Heyer, a counter-protester who was allegedly standing against the hateful demonstrators opposing the destruction of historic monuments. According to allegations referenced in the federal case, the SPLC was allegedly secretly paying an informant to organize the event, raising deeply troubling questions about whether the groups covert operations may have helped fuel the very unrest it publicly condemned.
Curiously, Jocelyn Benson, described by critics as Americas most crooked secretary of state, was serving as an SPLC board member in 2017 at the time of the Charlottesville violence. That overlap between her public office and her leadership role at the SPLC is now at the heart of the legal and political questions being raised by her conservative opponents.
In 2018, the far-left Democrat operative Jocelyn Benson was elected as Michigans Secretary of State after losing her first Soros-funded bid in 2014. Just before that successful 2018 run, observers noted that Bensons online profile appeared to have been scrubbed, with references to her ties to the radical SPLC hate group quietly disappearing from public view, a move that now looks less like routine housekeeping and more like calculated political damage control.
Former Attorney General Mike Cox, a Republican, is now seeking to force Benson to answer publicly for what she knew and what role she played in the SPLCs alleged payments to extremist organizations while she sat on its board. Cox has made clear that he intends to use the courts to compel transparency from a Democrat official who has long portrayed herself as a defender of democracy and civil rights.
Cox posted a pointed warning to Benson on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter. Jocelyn Benson you can run, but you cant hide. he warned, before adding, Youve been served, signaling that the legal battle over her SPLC ties has officially begun.
In a further statement, Cox laid out the core of his case against the Democrat hopeful. You served on the board of the SPLC that is now federally indicted for funding hate groups like the KKK while also serving as Michigans Secretary of State. Michigan deserves the truth about what she knew, how involved she was, and I will not rest until voters get that transparency.
Video of the serving incident, shared widely on social media, captures the moment a young man approaches Benson with a stack of legal documents as she walks with two men toward what appears to be a campaign event. Youve been served, the young man can be heard saying as he hands her the papers, confronting a visibly uncomfortable Benson in public view.
Benson, attempting to maintain composure, responds with a forced cheerfulness. Oh cool! Benson responds, adding, Thank you so much! as she smiles stiffly and tries to move past the interaction, clearly eager to escape the cameras and the confrontation.
The young man, undeterred, holds out another sheet of paper as he follows her and asks, Would you like to sign this? Benson continues to walk away, mumbling, Ah, you can send it over[inaudible] as she retreats, a moment that underscores how the legal and ethical questions surrounding her tenure are now literally following her onto the campaign trail.
Beyond the SPLC scandal, Benson is also facing serious accusations closer to home that cut directly against the progressive image she and her party have carefully cultivated. Despite her public alignment with left-wing causes and rhetoric about equity and inclusion, Benson is now in the midst of her second discrimination lawsuit in as many years, both brought by Black employees or former employees of her own department.
In August 2025, Bensons office reached a separation agreement with former Black, female employee Angela Harness that included a payment of $775,000. Harness, who served as Director of Quality and Customer Experience at the Michigan Department of State, had filed a notice of intent to sue, alleging a racially hostile work environment and related discrimination and retaliation.
Then, in January 2026, four Black employees of the Michigan Department of Statethree current and one formerfiled a civil lawsuit in Wayne County Circuit Court against Jocelyn Benson, the Michigan Department of State, the State of Michigan, and several senior staff members. The suit alleges racial discrimination, retaliation against those who complained about unfair treatment, a racially hostile workplace, and violations of Michigans Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act.
The plaintiffs claim there is a pattern of preferential treatment for white employees and other discriminatory practices that have gone unaddressed by Bensons leadership team. For a Democrat who routinely lectures others about systemic racism and social justice, the allegations paint a starkly different picture of how her own office operates behind closed doors.
The brave plaintiffs consist of three current Black staffers David Murray, Elvine Vanbolden, and Mychael Foster plus former high-ranking Nirva Civilus, who has been with the state for over 21 years. Theyre calling out Bensons crew for a widespread pattern of retaliation against black employees who dare speak up about discrimination.
Defendants have no effective system in place to track, correct, or prevent this unlawful discriminatory conduct, the complaint explains. That assertion, if borne out in court, would suggest not just isolated incidents but a systemic failure under Bensons watch, directly contradicting the progressive narrative she and her allies promote.
The fireworks dont stop with the testimony of these 3 individuals the lawsuit includes an affidavit from former Assistant Secretary of State Heaster Wheeler a Black powerhouse who cited rampant racial discrimination as a top reason for ditching the sinking ship. Wheeler isnt even a plaintiff, but his testimony is pure dynamite, pulling no punches on the departments failures and adding the voice of a seasoned insider to the growing chorus of critics.
As usual, whenever her back is against the wall, whether its being caught committing voter fraud or making it easier for voter fraud to be committed in Michigan, Bensons office is in full denial mode. They are labeling the claims against Benson as absolutely false and trotting out supposed clear policies on vehicle use and hiring, as if paperwork alone could erase the lived experiences of the Black employees who say they were mistreated.
Spokeswoman Angela Benander parroted the party line: The secretary and department leadership do not tolerate any harassment, discrimination, or retaliation. Tell that to the black employees who felt targeted while working for her, and to the taxpayers who are now footing the bill for six- and seven-figure settlements and mounting legal costs tied to Bensons management.
For conservatives, the pattern is hard to ignore: a Democrat official who brands herself as a champion of democracy and civil rights, yet presides over a department accused of racial bias and serves on the board of an organization now federally indicted for secretly funding extremist groups. The SPLC, long lionized by the left and amplified by corporate media as an arbiter of hate, now faces allegations that it used donor money to pay informants inside organizations like the KKK, with some of those funds allegedly supporting the very activities it publicly condemned.
Bensons dual roleas Michigans top election official and as a board member of that same SPLC during the years in questionraises profound questions about judgment, accountability, and transparency. Mike Coxs legal push aims to force those questions into the open, demanding that Benson explain what she knew and how involved she was while the SPLC allegedly funneled millions to extremists under the guise of combating hate.
As she eyes the governors mansion, Benson is likely to face increasing scrutiny not only from the courts but from voters who are tired of double standards and political theater. Whether on election integrity, racial discrimination in her own office, or her ties to a federally indicted civil rights group, the record she has built is one that Michigan citizensand especially those who value limited government, equal treatment under the law, and honest public servicewill have every reason to examine with care.
Login