Harmeet Dhillon Launches Harvard Inquiry Over Scholarships And Aid For Foreign Students

Written by Published

The US Department of Justice has opened a civil rights probe into Harvard University over allegations that the elite institution steered China-linked money into financial aid schemes that may unlawfully favor foreign nationals over American students.

According to The Post Millennial, the Justice Departments Civil Rights Division has initiated a Title VI compliance review to determine whether Harvards financial aid policies run afoul of federal law by discriminating on the basis of national origin. The inquiry arises from Harvards acceptance of substantial foreign donations that allegedly came with strings attached, directing scholarship funds toward students from particular countries rather than treating American citizens on an equal footing.

"Every American student should have an equal opportunity to compete for college scholarships, grants, and other kinds of financial aid and benefits," Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon declared in a statement announcing the investigation. "Schools cannot take federal dollars and then turn around and accept money from foreign sources to give financial aid that deliberately excludes American citizens doing so is illegal, and we will stop it wherever we find it."

Federal disclosures show Harvard has reported nearly $4.5 billion in foreign funding, more than any other university in the United States, underscoring the scale of its global financial entanglements. Of that sum, more than $630 million originated from China-based sources, raising particular concern at a time when Beijings influence operations and soft-power strategies are under heightened scrutiny.

Those disclosures, filed under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act, triggered the Civil Rights Divisions decision to scrutinize whether Harvards foreign-funded aid programs comply with anti-discrimination mandates. In a letter to Harvard General Counsel Jennifer OConnor, the department indicated it is examining whether the university accepted Chinese gifts and grants that required scholarship funds to be awarded with "preference given to students from particular countries."

The department stated that Harvard appears to have distributed those funds to foreign students, "presumably Chinese," on the basis of national origin, potentially sidelining students from other backgrounds, including American citizens. Such an arrangement, if proven, would effectively allow foreign donors to shape who benefits from aid at a federally funded institution, undermining the principle that taxpayer-supported universities should not disadvantage their own citizens.

The investigation centers on potential violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars recipients of federal financial assistance from discriminating on the grounds of race, color, or national origin. Because Harvard receives federal funding from the Department of Justice and multiple other agencies, it is bound by those civil rights obligations and could face serious penalties if found noncompliant.

"If we conclude that Harvard is not violating Title VI, we will notify you that we are closing the investigation," the departments letter states, signaling that exoneration remains possible if the facts support it. However, if investigators determine that Harvard is in violation, officials said they will first seek voluntary corrective action before resorting to enforcement measures such as suspending or terminating federal funds or filing a civil lawsuit.

As part of the probe, the Justice Department has ordered Harvard to turn over by July 31 a broad array of documents tied to Chinese-funded gifts, grants, and scholarship programs. The request covers donor-imposed restrictions, internal policies governing those funds, and communications detailing how the money was allocated and administered within the university.

Investigators have also demanded granular data on students who benefited from the Chinese-funded aid, including their country of origin, nationality, citizenship status, amount of aid received, school of enrollment, and graduation status. Citing federal regulations, the department emphasized that it is authorized to obtain protected student information when enforcing civil rights laws, a power that has long concerned privacy advocates but is now being deployed to test whether Americans are being treated fairly.

The information request specifically names several China-linked donors and institutions whose contributions are under review, including China Evergrande Group, Jiangsu Industrial Technology Research Institute, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, the Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust, and The University of Hong Kong. By zeroing in on these entities, the department is effectively probing whether foreign money has been used as a lever to reshape admissions and aid priorities inside one of Americas most powerful academic gatekeepers.

Officials stressed that the investigation is narrowly focused on whether conditions attached to those foreign donations produced scholarship or financial aid programs that unlawfully favored students based on national origin. Harvard has been directed to cooperate fully as federal investigators assess whether the universitys practices align with civil rights law, a test that will also signal how far Washington is prepared to go in reining in foreign influence and restoring equal treatment for American students in taxpayer-supported higher education.