Floridas Republican attorney general is moving to impeach a Miami judge who cleared a woman of criminal responsibility after she drowned her infant son and attacked members of her own family, citing an insanity defense tied to COVID-19.
According to The Western Journal, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier is targeting Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Miguel de la O over his decision to acquit Precious Bland, who in 2021 drowned her 15-month-old child and stabbed her husband and another child. The case, which shocked even seasoned law enforcement officers, has become a flashpoint in a broader conservative pushback against what many see as a judiciary increasingly willing to excuse violent crime under expansive interpretations of mental illness and pandemic-related stress.
Blands husband told police that during the rampage his wife screamed that Jesus Christ is coming and COVID is going to kill us all, a chilling statement that underscored her apparent break from reality. A police report further noted that the defendant insisted that everyone needed to be baptized and that she was going to baptize everyone in the bathtub, a delusion that ended with the death of an innocent child.
When officers arrived, they discovered the baby face down, unresponsive, inside the bathtub filled with bloody water, a scene that left no doubt about the brutality of the crime. The husband and four surviving children had fled the residence and called authorities, a desperate act that likely prevented further bloodshed.
Despite the evidence, de la O acquitted Bland on all three counts she faced, including one count of manslaughter and two counts of attempted first-degree murder. Even more controversially, he allowed Bland to return home pending a later hearing to determine her treatment options, a move critics argue prioritizes the offender over public safety.
Uthmeier, speaking to Fox News, did not mince words about the ruling, calling the judges decision unacceptable. He emphasized the extraordinary nature of the acquittal, stating, In a bench trial where the judge made the decision, not a jury he allowed a woman off on an insanity defense after she drowned her baby. He cited insanity related to COVID.
The attorney general framed the matter as a constitutional and moral issue, arguing that the state cannot allow judges to hide behind discretion when their rulings endanger citizens. I believe we have impeachment provisions in our state constitutions for a reason. The federal government has similar authorities, but we dont see judges getting impeached in modern times, Uthmeier added, suggesting that reluctance to use this tool has emboldened activist jurists.
Uthmeier made clear he views this case as part of a broader pattern of judicial leniency that undermines law and order. So, I believe this is wrong. Were going to be pushing hard to work with our legislature to hold some of these judges accountable. I believe theyre violating their oath and endangering our citizens.
De la O is not the only member of the bench in Uthmeiers sights, as the attorney general signaled a wider effort to restore accountability in the judiciary. He is actively exploring options to remove other judges whose decisions, in his view, place ideology or misplaced compassion above the safety of law-abiding families, and is coordinating with lawmakers to that end.
Ive already had some Florida legislators reach out, excited to work with me on articles of impeachment, and hopefully get some of these dangerous people off the bench, Uthmeier said, indicating that there is legislative appetite for a tougher stance. We have taken a big interest in judges that we believe are exceeding their authority, abusing discretion, or acting in a way that jeopardizes public safety, he continued, aligning his office with a conservative demand for stricter, more traditional interpretations of the law.
He pointed to other troubling cases as evidence that the problem extends beyond a single courtroom and reflects a systemic failure of judicial responsibility. Weve already called for impeachments in a couple of other judicial cases: a judge in Tallahassee who let a convicted child predator go free a guy where a jury found him guilty of a child sex offense, and he then murdered his 5-year-old stepdaughter.
In another example of what critics see as reckless leniency, Uthmeier cited a South Florida case that has outraged parents and victims advocates alike. In that instance, Theres a case in Miami where a judge let the defendant out on bail after he shoved rocks in a girls mouth as she was being raped, a decision that, for many conservatives, epitomizes a justice system that has lost sight of its duty to protect the innocent.
For Uthmeier and those backing his efforts, these cases raise a fundamental question about whether judges who repeatedly side with violent offenders can be trusted to uphold their oath. By pressing for impeachment and tighter scrutiny of the bench, Floridas attorney general is signaling that, at least in his state, the era of consequence-free judicial activism may be coming to an end.
Login