ActBlue chief executive Regina Wallace-Jones on Wednesday repeatedly invoked her Fifth Amendment right and refused to answer questions during a House Administration Committee hearing examining the Democratic fundraising platforms allegedly illegal practices and potential role in funneling foreign money into U.
S. elections.
According to Gateway Pundit, Wallace-Jones was summoned to testify at a session titled Preventing Fraudulent Donations: Transparency, Verification, and Accountability after her attorneys warned she may have misled Congress in a 2023 letter about ActBlues vetting of foreign donations. The hearing placed the embattled CEO at the center of a widening investigation into whether the lefts premier online fundraising machine has become a conduit for dark money and foreign influence, even as Democrats on the panel largely shielded her from scrutiny.
For years, Gateway Pundit has documented how ActBlues opaque structure and lax safeguards have enabled foreign money and unverified small-dollar donations to flow to Democratic candidates and causes. One of the tactics highlighted involves so?called ActBlue smurfs, in which unsuspecting individuals names and personal information are allegedly used to generate a flurry of donations without their knowledge, inflating the appearance of grassroots support while masking the true source of funds.
During the hearing, Wallace-Jones refused to answer a single substantive question, pleading the Fifth Amendment 22 times as House Administration Committee Chairman Bryan Steil (R?WI) pressed her on ActBlues internal controls and prior statements to Congress. The questions from Steil, entered into the record, focused on whether ActBlue knowingly accepted foreign contributions, misrepresented its fraud?prevention practices, and failed to correct false testimony once senior leadership became aware of it.
WATCH:
Wallace-Jones also stonewalled House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R?OH) and Rep. Greg Murphy (R?NC), again declining to respond as they probed the platforms internal communications and alleged retaliation against employees who raised concerns. The CEOs refusal to engage extended across multiple lines of inquiry, leaving Republicans to characterize her silence as part of a broader pattern of obstruction by a company central to Democratic fundraising.
WATCH:
Throughout the hearing, Wallace-Jones appeared almost defiant as she continued to gleefully refuse to answer any questions posed by Republican lawmakers. Per the New York Times, The Democrats at the hearing posed no questions to Ms. Wallace-Jones but instead attacked WinRed, the Republican fund-raising platform, and Ken Paxton, the Texas attorney general and Senate nominee who has mounted his own investigation of ActBlue.
This public clash comes as congressional Republicans intensify their probe into ActBlues handling of foreign donations and alleged misrepresentations to federal lawmakers. Last week, House Administration Chairman Bryan Steil, Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, and Oversight and Government Reform Chairman James Comer (R?KY) sent formal letters demanding documents and transcribed interviews from five members of ActBlues Board of Directors.
As reported by Fox, The letters come as ActBlue is under intense pressure over whether it accurately represented its fraud-prevention practices and handling of foreign donations that may have been routed through the platform into U.S. elections. The Republican-led committees have accused the platform of stonewalling their investigation by withholding documents subpoenaed by the panel and failing to be transparent after learning about the potential misrepresentation of facts.
The letters seek answers on the fundraising giants knowing and willful acceptance of foreign donations, false statements previously made under oath by Regina Wallace-Jones, and documented efforts to mislead Congress. Excerpts from the correspondence to ActBlues Board of Directors underscore the seriousness of the allegations and the potential legal exposure for both the CEO and the board.
According to the New York Times, in February 2025, ActBlue staff notified the companys Board of Directors about vulnerabilities stemming from apparently knowing and willful acceptance of foreign donations and CEO Regina Wallace-Joness past misrepresentations to Congress about these donations. You reportedly stated that ActBlue, apparently in consultation with the Board of Directors, decided not to correct Ms. Wallace-Joness false statements to Congress.
Internal emails produced to the Committees indicate that ActBlues union also raised concerns to the Board of Directors during the same period about mass resignations, firings, and alleged internal retaliation related to ActBlues failure to adequately address fraud and apparent attempts to mislead Congress. These internal warnings, if substantiated, suggest that concerns about fraud and foreign money were not isolated but widely recognized within the organizations own ranks.
Trending: Socialist Los Angeles Mayor Candidate Nithya Raman Thanks Voters in Twitter/X Message and the Replies Are Absolutely BRUTAL! Previously, as The Gateway Pundit reported, the House Judiciary Committee deposed five ActBlue employees, and they all pleaded the Fifth Amendment to 146 different questions.
For conservatives who have long warned that the lefts small?dollar juggernaut operates with far less transparency than it demands from its opponents, the spectacle of ActBlues leadership and staff invoking the Fifth over 20 times only deepens suspicions. With multiple committees now circling, and with Democrats choosing to attack Republicans rather than demand answers from their own fundraising arm, the central question remains whether ActBlue will ever fully account for its role in potentially channeling foreign and fraudulent money into American elections.
Login