The Senate has once again stumbled in its effort to renew key national security surveillance authorities, as opposition to President Donald Trumps nominee for Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Bill Pulte, spilled into a broader fight over the nations spy powers.
In a pre-dawn vote Friday, nearly every Senate Democrat joined with six Republicans to block a procedural motion to advance reauthorization of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), even as a hard deadline looms next week, according to Fox News. What under normal circumstances would likely have been a routine, bipartisan step toward renewing a critical intelligence tool has instead become entangled with partisan resistance to President Trumps choice to lead the intelligence community.
The nomination of Pulte, currently director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, has turned what should be a sober national security debate into a political spectacle. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., warned that Congress could not "afford to go dark" by allowing FISA authorities to lapse, and expressed hope that Democrats would rethink their obstruction when the Senate returns next week.
Thune faces a difficult arithmetic problem: with a bloc of Republicans skeptical of FISA on civil-liberties grounds, he needs at least some Democratic cooperation to clear the 60-vote threshold. "We need some help from Democrats, obviously, and I think it's a terrible irresponsible position that they've taken," Thune said. "But we'll find out if that changes."
President Trump tapped Pulte earlier this week to replace ex-DNI Tulsi Gabbard, who left the post last month, a move that surprised many in his own party and enraged Democrats. The choice has prompted questions about Pultes background, given that the DNI is responsible for coordinating the work of 18 intelligence agencies at a time of mounting global threats.
Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, openly threatened to withhold support for FISA renewal as long as Pulte is the nominee. "I don't see how you get the necessary Democrat votes that would get them to 60," Warner said.
Some Republicans have voiced reservations about Pultes rsum without joining Democrats blockade of vital surveillance tools. "I know what he's been doing in the housing sector," Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said. "I'm not so familiar with why the president would have selected him."
Democrats, meanwhile, have framed the nomination as a loyalty play rather than a security decision, casting further doubt on their willingness to back FISA. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., claimed Trumps decision "appears to have been a hastily considered backroom deal based on loyalty to Trump, not the security of our nation."
Schumer also argued that the timing of the announcement was politically and substantively damaging. "The timing of this announcement could not be worse, with just over a week until FISA 702 authorities expire," Schumer said. "This announcement and its timing clearly make passing an extension of FISA much harder."
Republican leaders still hope to finalize a bipartisan FISA bill and send it to the House before the June 12 deadline, seeking to preserve essential intelligence capabilities while addressing legitimate privacy concerns. Pultes nomination, however, has further complicated a debate that has already forced Congress to delay action twice, largely over disagreements surrounding the controversial Section 702.
The FISA fight is one of the rare issues that unites civil-liberties-minded conservatives and many Democrats in demanding stronger protections for Americans privacy. Section 702 allows the government to monitor foreign nationals overseas, yet nothing in the statute prevents incidental collection of Americans data when they are part of those communications, leaving Congress to decide whether it will refine the law or allow partisan maneuvering over a Trump nominee to jeopardize core national security tools.
Login