Democrats are once again proving that ideological extremism now outweighs basic moral judgment inside their party.
According to RedState, the latest flashpoint comes from Maine, where Democratic Rep. Jake Auchincloss of Massachusetts dared to say out loud what any party with a functioning moral compass would regard as obvious: that his partys Senate candidate in Maine, Graham Platner, should be disqualified over a Nazi tattoo and his subsequent attempts to explain it away. Appearing on CNN, Auchincloss did not mince words.
Ive been clear about Graham Platner. I find that tattoo and his commentary about it to be personally disqualifying. I hope Maine voters agree with me. I think it would be a mistake for the Democratic Party to think that Graham Platners brand of the Democratic Party is what wins us durable majorities throughout this country.
That statement, on its face, is not controversial to anyone who still believes there are lines that should not be crossed in American politics. Yet within the Democratic ecosystem, the outrage was not directed at a candidate with a Nazi tattoo, but at the Democrat who said such a thing should matter. Party activists and operatives did not rally around the idea that some standards must be upheld; instead, they erupted in fury that Auchincloss had the temerity to question the presumptive nominee in a race they view as strategically important.
The reaction from the left was swift and revealing. Rather than grappling with the implications of elevating a candidate with such a stain on his record, prominent progressives accused Auchincloss of effectively siding with Republicans and undermining the partys quest for power.
Jake Auchincloss is essentially endorsing [GOPer] Susan Collins in Maine. Absolutely no excuse for a Democrat in the House to back a Republican for Senate in a crucial swing seat, complained Saikat Chakrabarti, a California congressional hopeful and former chief of staff to far-left New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Dem pollster Adam Carlson piled on, grumbling, A smart reporter would ask Jake Auchincloss the chairman of Majority Democrats why he wants Trump to have a Republican Senate majority for his final two years in office.
The pile-on did not stop there, as professional Democratic strategists joined the chorus. Former Kamala Harris deputy campaign manager Rob Flaherty sneered, Does feel kind of odd to be the Chairman of an org called Majority Democrats and then endorse against both Democrats and a Majority.
In other words, the message from the Democratic left is unmistakable: party control first, principle last, if at all. The idea that a Nazi tattoo might be a moral red line is treated as a secondary concern, something to be brushed aside if it complicates the quest for a Senate majority.
From a conservative vantage point, this is precisely the problem with a party that has allowed radical activists to dominate its internal debates. When control becomes the only principle, there is no principle, and the voters who still care about character and judgment are left wondering whether Democrats are capable of policing their own ranks at all.
Auchincloss, notably a centrist in a party that has fewer and fewer of them, appeared to be making a broader strategic argument as well as a moral one. By warning that Graham Platners brand of the Democratic Party is not how the party wins durable majorities, he implicitly acknowledged that mainstream Americans are unlikely to embrace a candidate with such a background, and that trying to force such a figure on voters is a recipe for backlash.
Yet the fury directed at him suggests that many Democrats are willing to roll the dice anyway. There are, as RedState noted, other Democrats running in the Maine primary, but party insiders are not rallying to them, apparently because they do not believe those alternatives can win.
Instead, Democrats are fixated on polling that currently shows Platner leading Republican Sen. Susan Collins by 7.5 percentage points. That narrow snapshot is what they care about, even though recent history in Maine suggests such early numbers can be wildly misleading.
Collins herself was significantly trailing Democrat Sara Gideon by similar margins in nearly every poll during her 2020 reelection campaign. When the votes were counted, however, Collins won comfortably, defeating Gideon by about 8.6 percentage points and underscoring how out of touch Democratic strategists can be with the actual electorate.
Under pressure from his own side, Auchincloss has now tried to clarify his position, issuing a new statement that attempts to thread the needle between moral clarity and party loyalty. He insisted he is not backing Collins, while reiterating that Platners record remains unacceptable to him.
Susan Collins is a rubber stamp for the worst admin in history. Claims that I would endorse her, implicitly or otherwise, ignore my track record supporting Democrats to take back both chambers. As I said months ago, I find Platner's Nazi tattoo and his commentary about it personally disqualifying. If it were me I'd vote for someone else in the Maine Democratic primary.
He added that his broader objective remains unchanged. Regardless of what happens in Maine, Democrats need to take back the Senate and I'll keep working hard to make it happen.
Even in this attempted damage control, however, Auchincloss felt compelled to parrot the standard Democratic line that Collins is a rubber stamp for the worst admin in history, a claim belied by Collins well-documented breaks with President Donald Trump on key votes. That rhetorical concession did not spare him from further attacks, as activists continued to demand that he explicitly endorse the eventual Democratic nominee, regardless of the nominees baggage.
One critic framed the demand in starkly transactional terms. It's very simple: as a Democratic member of Congress working for a Democratic congressional majority, will you be endorsing the Democratic candidate for Senate in Maine, or no?
Some on the left have even begun floating the idea of a primary challenge to Auchincloss, a move that would almost certainly push his seat further left and empower the very radicals who are already steering the party off a moral cliff. For conservatives, the episode is a clarifying moment: when a Democrat who objects to a Nazi tattoo becomes the villain in his own partys narrative, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that the Democratic Party is now firmly in the grip of its most radical elements.
Login