Brian Cole, the Virginia man accused of planting explosive devices outside both major party headquarters on the eve of the January 6 unrest, is now facing an expanded slate of federal charges as questions mount over the governments handling of the case and its treatment of potential alternative suspects.
According to the Gateway Pundit, a superseding indictment filed Wednesday added two serious counts against Cole: Interstate Transportation of Explosives and Malicious Attempt to Use Explosives. Cole, 30, of Woodbridge, Virginia, was originally taken into custody in December and charged with use of an explosive device and attempted malicious destruction by means of explosive materials.
Federal authorities claim Cole initially admitted to investigators that he planted pipe bombs at the RNC and DNC headquarters on January 5, the night before the Capitol riot. Despite that alleged admission, Cole entered a not guilty plea to all charges earlier this year, setting the stage for a high-stakes legal battle with significant political overtones.
The FBI says it identified Cole through a combination of cellphone location data and credit-card transaction records, according to an affidavit filed in the case. The FBI has identified one bank checking account and six credit cards (the Accounts) used by COLE. The FBI obtained records for the checking account and three credit cards for the time period January 2018 to January 2021. Three additional credit cards were obtained for the time period of January 2018 to November 2025. The FBI reviewed the transaction history for all of these Accounts.
Coles family has pushed back against the narrative of a politically motivated bomber, describing him instead as an autistic recluse and computer nerd who lived in the basement of his parents Woodbridge home. His grandmother told The Daily Mail that her grandson has no party affiliation and that he is not a Trump supporter, undercutting the lefts preferred storyline of a MAGA-inspired extremist.
In a move certain to inflame critics of the Justice Departments January 6 prosecutions, Coles attorneys have argued that their client is covered by President Trumps blanket January 6 pardons. That argument, if accepted, would represent a significant check on the federal governments expansive pursuit of January 6-related cases, which many conservatives view as politically selective and excessively punitive.
Earlier this month, Coles legal team filed a motion for early return of subpoenas that publicly disclosed information about the DOJs review of Capitol Police Officer Shauni Kerkhoffs alleged role in January 6. As TGPs Brian Lupo previously reported, in a motion filed a couple of weeks ago, Brian Coles lawyers alleged, according to discovery produced by the government in this case, the FBI began investigating, questioning, and covertly surveilling Kerkhoff during the time it began investigating Mr. Cole.
On November 6, 2025, Kerkhoff was interviewed by the FBI and took a polygraph examination, a step that suggests federal agents considered her a serious subject of interest. She was asked two relevant questions: (1) Did you place those pipe bombs? and (2) Did you place those pipe bombs that evening? Ms. Kerkhoff failed the polygraph. The FBI polygraph examiner noted Kerkhoffs very controlled reaction to the news of her failing the polygraph and seemingly rehearsed responses to the examiners questions. the motion said.
Later that same day, the Justice Department moved to hold Coles lawyers in contempt for allegedly violating a protective order by publicly posting allegations against former Capitol Police officer Shauni Kerkhoff. The motion filed by Brian Coles lawyers was swiftly removed from the public docket, a move that will only deepen concerns among civil libertarians and conservatives that the government is more interested in controlling the narrative than in full transparency about who, in fact, planted the January 6 pipe bombs.
Login