Ohio Republicans are moving to sharply curtail the states booming sports betting industry by outlawing all wagers on college athletics and banning bets placed on mobile phones.
The proposed crackdown comes barely three years after lawmakers opened the door to legalized sports wagering, a move that has since generated billions in tax revenue for the state, according to Just The News. Now, a growing bloc of conservative legislators is arguing that the social and moral costs of ubiquitous gambling far outweigh the fiscal benefits, and they are pressing to restore guardrails they say should never have been removed.
State Rep. Riordan McClain, R-Upper Sandusky, has emerged as a leading voice for reform, warning that the culture around sports has been overwhelmed by gambling promotion. Its impossible to watch the games or even listen to sports content without being bombarded with advertisements and offers from gambling companies, particularly focused on the winning, McClain said.
McClain contends that the industrys glossy marketing hides a harsh mathematical reality for ordinary Ohioans. Regularly referenced stats show that only 5% of betters are profitable, McClain said. And those betters that do win are quickly identified and often by the gambling companies, he said. That means that 95% of Ohioans that are betting make deposits, not withdrawals.
Other Republican lawmakers are framing the issue as a matter of public health, family stability and basic human dignity, not just consumer choice. They argue that the state has a duty, consistent with conservative principles of ordered liberty, to step in when a commercial product becomes so addictive that it destroys marriages, mental health and, in extreme cases, lives.
I read from some sources that this is more addictive than actually the use of cocaine, said State Rep. Gary Click, R-Vickery. While were not going to roll back the clock to where it was before, we are going to put some common-sense protections in place to protect Ohio citizens."
Under the new legislation, sports betting would be confined to brick-and-mortar casinos, eliminating the 24/7 access that comes with smartphone apps. The bills would also cap both the size of wagers and how frequently bets can be placed, and they include a no debt to bet provision that would bar the use of credit for sports gambling.
The effort has drawn support from former athletes who have watched the line between competition and speculation blur. Lawrence Funderburke, who starred at Columbus Wehrle High School and Ohio State before playing in the NBA, endorsed the legislation and warned that gambling is corroding the integrity of the games themselves.
He noted that even professional players are increasingly entangled in betting scandals that undermine public trust. All of these guys have given a black eye to professional sports, he said.
Funderburke added that legal wagering has spawned a cottage industry of side hustlers who pressure athletes to manipulate play for financial gain. He said legal gambling encourages side hustlers friends and family members to try to convince players to do things on the playing field to influence bets.
Sponsors of the bill say the same sophisticated geolocation technology that enabled the rapid spread of mobile betting can now be used to rein it in. Sports gambling companies can pinpoint whether a user is in Ohio, they argue, which would allow them to block state residents from downloading or using betting apps on their phones.
The industry, however, insists that regulated markets are safer than pushing gambling back into the shadows. Legal sports betting is much less harmful than the alternative illegal betting, argues a nonprofit industry group, International Masters of Gaming Law.
States that have legalized sports betting can regulate problem gambling, including educating and warning people on the dangers and signs of gambling addiction, screening people for problem gambling, and offering voluntary bans and betting limits to people, the group says. Unregulated markets, meanwhile, have no such interests or concern over protecting individuals engaging in problem gambling.
As President Trumps second administration emphasizes law and order, personal responsibility and the protection of families, Ohios debate encapsulates a broader conservative question: how far should government go to shield citizens from predatory industries without smothering individual freedom and market choice.
With billions in revenue on one side and the moral, mental and marital fallout of addiction on the other, Republican lawmakers are signaling that for them, the integrity of sports and the well-being of Ohio families must take precedence over the gambling windfall.
Login