NASAs historic Artemis II mission has barely cleared Earths atmosphere, yet the medias fixation on identity politics is already threatening to overshadow the actual achievement.
According to Western Journal, CBS News highlighted that Artemis II launched Wednesday from Kennedy Space Center in Florida, marking the first crewed mission to the moon since Apollo more than half a century ago. Rather than focusing on the technical marvel, the courage of the crew, or the broader implications for American leadership in space under President Trumps second administration, reporters quickly pivoted to a familiar and tiresome theme: race.
The missions pilot, Astronaut Victor Glover, was pressed on what it meant to be the first black man to travel to the moon, as if his skin color were more newsworthy than his skill, training, and responsibility. Glover, to his credit, refused to be boxed into the narrative and instead elevated the conversation beyond the narrow lens of identity.
It is a big question and I want to highlight the tension, Glover said, acknowledging the cultural pressure to treat every milestone through the prism of race and gender. He continued, I live in this dichotomy between happiness that a young woman can look at Christina [Astronaut and Artemis II crew member Christina Koch] and just physicalize her passion or her interest, or even if its not something she wants to do, she can just be like, girl power and thats awesome.
Glover also recognized that representation can inspire, especially for minority children who rarely see themselves in such roles. And that young brown boys and girls can look at me and go, Hey, he looks like me and hes doing what? and thats great and I love that, but I also hope we are pushing the other direction that one day we dont have to talk about these first that one day this is just the human history.
Its about human history, Glover said, cutting through the medias obsession with labels. Its the story of humanity, not black history, not womens history, but that it becomes human history.
That perspective stands in stark contrast to the progressive insistence on slicing every accomplishment into racial and gender categories. The question itself centering on Glovers race rather than his mission is peculiar, even demeaning, as if black people or women somehow experience space differently.
This is the logical end of diversity, equity and inclusion ideology: a constant, exhausting demand to view individuals not as professionals or patriots, but as mascots for demographic groups. Glover is an astronaut, entrusted with a high-risk, high-skill role because of merit, discipline, and excellence, not because he checks a box on a DEI form.
America has mourned astronauts lost in past missions, and in those moments, race was rightly irrelevant to the sacrifice and the stakes. By repeatedly foregrounding Glovers race, the media risks planting the insidious notion that his achievements are owed to identity politics rather than hard work and competence.
That is where the subtle bigotry lies: in implying that black Americans cannot simply be outstanding on their own terms, but must always be framed as firsts and symbols. Glovers own words point to a healthier, more conservative vision one where Americans are judged by their abilities and character, where space exploration is a testament to human ingenuity, and where the story of Artemis II belongs to all of humanity, not to a checklist of categories.
Login