A new court filing in the Charlie Kirk assassination case has raised fresh doubts about the prosecutions narrative and intensified questions surrounding the evidence against accused shooter Tyler Robinson.
According to Gateway Pundit, defense attorneys for Robinson disclosed on Friday that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has so far been unable to identify the bullet recovered during the autopsy of conservative leader Charlie Kirk as having been fired from the rifle allegedly tied to Robinson. Kirk, a prominent Turning Point USA figure and outspoken conservative commentator, was reportedly killed instantly by a single rifle shot that tore through his upper body and severed the carotid artery in his neck during a September 10 appearance at Utah Valley University.
As reported by Gateway Pundit, the defense filing cites a key finding: the ATFs firearms analyst could not conclusively match the fatal bullet to the rifle that prosecutors claim Robinson used. While the bullet may have been deformed in the shooting, the inability to link it definitively to the weapon is now central to the defenses argument that the governments case is far from airtight.
The Daily Mail summarized the development bluntly: The bullet that killed conservative commentator Charlie Kirk did not match the rifle used by suspected killer Tyler Robinson, a bombshell new court filing states. Robinson, 22, is facing capital murder charges and a potential death sentence for Kirks killing at Utah Valley University on September 10, a crime that shocked conservatives nationwide and immediately raised concerns about escalating political violence against right-of-center voices.
In the new motion, Robinsons attorneys argue that the ATF was unable to identify the bullet recovered at autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Mr Robinson. The defense team indicated they may now call the ATF firearms analyst as a witness and present his findings as exculpatory evidence, underscoring their contention that the states case is not as clear-cut as initially portrayed.
The motion, filed Friday, also asks the court to delay the preliminary hearing by at least six months to allow the defense time to process the massive volume of evidence. The filing notes that DNA reports from both the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the ATF will require extensive review, particularly because reports indicated that several different DNA were found on some items of evidence, suggesting that multiple individuals may have come into contact with key materials.
Fox News, citing the same court documents, reported that Robinsons defense team has now revealed who prosecutors intend to call as witnesses at the upcoming preliminary hearing. Attorneys for Tyler Robinson, the man accused of assassinating conservative icon Charlie Kirk, have revealed who prosecutors intend to call to the stand and also asked the court to delay the preliminary hearing, the outlet reported, highlighting the high stakes and intense scrutiny surrounding the case.
According to the filing, prosecutors plan to call Robinsons parents, as well as his roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, to testify at the preliminary hearing. Robinsons attorneys are simultaneously urging the judge to grant a minimum six-month postponement of that hearing, which is currently scheduled for May 18, arguing that the complexity and volume of the evidence make the existing timeline unrealistic and unfair.
Robinsons defense team told the court that they received more than 600,000 files from prosecutors during a March 12 meeting, a trove of material they say will take substantial time to review. They further emphasized that the discovery process is not yet complete, meaning additional evidence may still be forthcoming and will also need to be examined in detail.
Discovery in this case is incomplete, voluminous, and the processing of it is complex, the defense team wrote, underscoring their position that rushing to a preliminary hearing would undermine Robinsons right to a fair defense. One of the defenses experts, a forensic biologist, has reportedly told attorneys she will need six months just to review the existing evidence, reinforcing the request for a significant delay.
Early in the investigation, prosecutors sought to bolster their case by filing what they described as an incriminating text message chain between Robinson and his alleged male transgender lover, Lance Twiggs, in which Robinson purportedly confessed to the shooting. The BBC previously reported on this alleged exchange, which prosecutors have portrayed as a virtual admission of guilt and which the defense will now have to confront or discredit.
In the alleged messages, Robinson wrote to Twiggs: drop what you are doing, look under my keyboard. When the roommate looked under the keyboard, there was a note that allegedly read: I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and Im going to take it. That note, if authenticated, would be a powerful piece of evidence for the prosecution, but its context and chain of custody will likely be heavily scrutinized by the defense.
The roommate responded in apparent shock: What?????????????? Youre joking, right???? Robinson allegedly replied with a detailed and unsettling explanation of his situation and intentions, writing, I am still ok my love, but am stuck in orem for a little while longer yet. Shouldnt be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. To be honest I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you.
The roommate pressed further, asking, you werent the one who did it right???? Robinsons alleged response was chillingly direct: I am, Im sorry. When the roommate then said, I thought they caught the person? Robinson replied, no, they grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. Its quiet, almost enough to get out, but theres one vehicle lingering.
The roommate then asked the obvious question: Why? Robinson responded, Why did I do it? prompting the roommate to clarify: Yeah. Robinson then allegedly wrote, I had enough of his hatred. Some hate cant be negotiated out. That line, if genuine, reflects a political or ideological motive, one that fits a broader pattern of hostility toward conservative figures that the left and its media allies often downplay or ignore.
Robinson also allegedly discussed his efforts to avoid leaving evidence, telling Twiggs, If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again, hopefully they have moved on. I havent seen anything about them finding it. He repeated the same line again: If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again, hopefully they have moved on. I havent seen anything about them finding it.
When Twiggs asked, How long have you been planning this? Robinson allegedly replied, a bit over a week I believe. I can get close to it but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I dont wanna chance it. That timeframe, if accurate, would suggest premeditation rather than a spontaneous act, a factor that could weigh heavily in a capital murder case.
Robinson went on to express anxiety about the weapons connection to his family, writing, Im wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle. Im worried what my old man would do if I didnt bring back grandpas rifle idek if it had a serial number, but it wouldnt trace to me. I worry about prints I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. didnt have the ability or time to bring it with. I might have to abandon it and hope they dont find prints. how the [expletive] will I explain losing it to my old man.
He added, only thing I left was the rifle wrapped in a towel. and then referenced a bizarre detail about ammunition: remember how I was engraving bullets? The [expletive] messages are mostly a big meme, if I see notices bulge uwu on fox new I might have a stroke alright im gonna have to leave it, that really [expletive] sucks. judging from today Id say grandpas gun does just fine idk. I think that was a $2k scope;-; These comments, if verified, could be used by prosecutors to argue that Robinson took elaborate steps to prepare for and then conceal the crime.
Robinson then allegedly instructed Twiggs to destroy the evidence of their conversation, writing, delete this exchange. He followed up with another message indicating growing concern about the weapons exposure: my dad wants photos of the rifle he says grandpa wants to know who has what, the feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique. Hes calling me rn, not answering.
In another message, Robinson reportedly commented on his fathers political leanings, stating, since trump got into office [my dad] has been pretty diehard maga. That remark underscores the tragic irony of the case: a young man allegedly targeting a conservative leader while coming from a family that supported President Trump and the Make America Great Again movement.
Robinson then allegedly told Twiggs he intended to surrender: Im gonna turn myself in willingly, one of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff. He added a personal note of concern, writing, you are all I worry about love, to which the roommate responded, Im much more worried about you.
Finally, Robinson urged Twiggs to avoid the media and law enforcement without legal counsel, writing, dont talk to the media please. dont take any interviews or make any comments. if any police ask you questions ask for a lawyer and stay silent. Those instructions, if authenticated, could be interpreted by prosecutors as consciousness of guilt, while the defense may argue they reflect understandable fear in the face of an overwhelming state apparatus.
Against this backdrop of alleged digital confessions and emotional exchanges, the ATFs inability so far to match the fatal bullet to the rifle said to be tied to Robinson introduces a significant complication for the prosecution. For conservatives already wary of politicized law enforcement and selective media coverage, the case raises pressing questions: Was every lead pursued impartially, is the forensic evidence as solid as initially claimed, and will the justice system handle the killing of a conservative figure with the same rigor and transparency it would afford a victim on the left?
As the defense pushes for more time to analyze hundreds of thousands of files, multiple DNA profiles, and complex forensic reports, the coming months will determine whether the state can substantiate its narrative beyond the disputed text messages and circumstantial evidence. For now, the unresolved ballistics issue, the sheer volume of discovery, and the ideological overtones of the alleged motive ensure that the fight over who killed Charlie Kirkand whywill remain at the center of a legal and political storm.
Login