Republicans pressing ahead with the SAVE America Act in the Senate are now confronting fresh evidence that China has already penetrated key components of Americas election infrastructure and that the Biden administration and its media allies have been in no hurry to tell the public.
According to Gateway Pundit, a newly surfaced intelligence document from 2020, obtained by Just the News and corroborated by officials familiar with the underlying investigation, shows that Beijing successfully conducted electronic intrusions into unspecified U.S. election systems as part of a broader cyber?espionage effort. The revelation lands at a politically explosive moment, because it directly implicates the integrity of the 2020 election an election that the left insists was beyond reproach and that many conservatives have never fully accepted as legitimate.
The threat, intelligence officials warned at the time, emanated from the Peoples Republic of China, the United States most formidable adversary on the world stage and a regime that has made digital surveillance and cyber?warfare central to its authoritarian toolkit. According to the document, Chinese operatives did not merely probe American networks in the abstract; they specifically targeted election?related systems and data.
[Redacted] Chinese intelligence officials analyzed multiple U.S. states [Redacted] election voter registration data, [Redacted] to conduct public opinion analysis on the 2020 US general election, stated one section of an April 2020 National Intelligence Council memorandum. The memo, titled Cyber Operations Enabling Expansive Authoritarianism, was quietly declassified in 2022, yet it drew virtually no public comment from President Joe Bidens administration or from the establishment press that otherwise claims to be obsessed with defending democracy.
That means six years later that the U.S. intelligence community has yet to fully inform the American people or the Congress on the breadth of evidence it possesses of Chinas actions, how Beijing got the data, and what operations it has taken or contemplated, wrote Just the News founder John Solomon and chief investigative correspondent Jerry Dunleavy. Their reporting underscores a pattern conservatives have long suspected: when foreign interference narratives can be weaponized against Republicans, they dominate the news cycle; when they raise uncomfortable questions about Democrats, they are buried.
The data at issue, according to the memo and subsequent reporting, involved voter registration information rather than the ballot?casting or vote?tabulation systems themselves. That distinction, however, does not make the breach benign, particularly in an era when data is power and foreign adversaries weaponize personal information to manipulate public opinion and pressure political actors.
Voter registration data is not the same as ballots, where Americans choose their candidates, Solomon and Dunleavy wrote. But it contains sensitive personally identifying information, including drivers license data and partial Social Security numbers. The data is considered so sensitive that several Democrat states are currently trying to keep the Trump Justice Department from obtaining it and liberal groups claim it is a holy grail of election integrity. In other words, Democrats simultaneously insist this information is too sensitive to share with a Republican administration while appearing curiously unconcerned when it falls into the hands of the Chinese Communist Party.
Notably, the one senior intelligence official who publicly raised serious alarms about Chinese activities in the 2020 cycle was then?Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, appointed by President Donald Trump. Ratcliffe repeatedly warned that Beijing posed the most comprehensive foreign threat to U.S. elections, only to be dismissed or downplayed by the same media outlets that had spent years amplifying every rumor of Russian mischief.
The Biden administrations selective outrage becomes even more striking when contrasted with its posture toward similar Chinese activity in the United Kingdom. From The Wall Street Journal in April 2024 came the report that Washington and London jointly moved against alleged Chinese hackers who had compromised the U.K.s electoral register, with the Biden team loudly touting its response.
The Biden administration hit alleged Chinese hackers with sanctions and criminal charges on Monday while the British government accused Beijing of hacking the U.K.s electoral register to steal the personal details of tens of millions of voters, part of a global push by allies to condemn Chinas expanding aggression in cyberspace. the Journal reported. The alleged hackers, alongside five other defendants, were also indicted on criminal charges unsealed by the U.S. Justice Department, and the U.S. State Department offered a $10 million reward for information about the group.
Senior Treasury official Brian Nelson struck a tough pose in that case, declaring, The United States will continue its work to disrupt the dangerous and irresponsible actions of cyber actors targeting critical infrastructure. Through continued close coordination with our U.K. partners, and a unified, whole of government approach, we will protect our citizens from the catastrophic risks these reckless cyber activities pose. The rhetoric was forceful, the press releases were plentiful, and the administration was eager to be seen as standing shoulder?to?shoulder with Britain against Beijings digital aggression.
British authorities, for their part, were transparent about the scope of the intrusion. The U.K.s Electoral Commission, which manages elections, said last year that hackers had accessed the nations voter-registration recordswhich included the names and addresses of around 40 million peopleas well as the commissions email system and information about political donors. The hackers accessed the system in 2021 but were only detected in late 2022, the commission said at the time. London did not pretend the incident was trivial, nor did it hide the fact that a hostile foreign power had obtained a massive trove of voter data.
That raises an obvious question: if the Biden administration was willing to go public and pound the table over Chinese hacking of the U.K.s electoral register, why did it not similarly alert the American people that Beijing had engaged in comparable operations against U.S. election systems? A generous interpretation might be that U.S. officials did not want to tip their hand and reveal to Chinese intelligence what Washington knew about their methods and capabilities.
A less charitable and, to many conservatives, more plausible explanation is that the political narrative surrounding the 2020 election took precedence over transparency and national security. The country was instructed to accept that 2020 was The Safest and Most Secure Election Ever, and any information that might complicate that slogan, particularly evidence of Chinese cyber?operations, threatened to undermine the story Democrats and their media allies were determined to sell.
By comparison, the much?ballyhooed Russian interference in 2016, which Democrats insist handed Trump the presidency, has never been shown to be more than a mix of social?media trolling, phishing attempts, and low?rent propaganda. As the memo makes clear, this is not a matter of a few dodgy Moldovan fake news sites pushing lurid fabrications about Hillary Clinton to gullible Facebook users; it is a hostile superpower systematically acquiring sensitive voter data and using it for public opinion analysis and potentially more.
Here, by contrast, is a National Intelligence Council assessment drafted in the heat of the 2020 campaign, confirming that China had obtained multiple U.S. states voter registration data and was exploring ways to extend its cyber?authoritarian model beyond its own borders in Beijing, Hong Kong, Xinjiang, and other oppressed regions. For a White House that claims to be waging a global struggle between democracy and autocracy, that should have been a big deal worthy of urgent public discussion.
Instead, for nearly four years, the Biden administration offered little more than silence, even as President Biden projected weakness in the face of an increasingly aggressive Xi Jinping. The contrast between the administrations rhetorical bravado about standing up to dictators and its reticence about Chinese interference in our own electoral systems has not gone unnoticed on the right.
Biden campaigned as the self?styled defender of democracy, insisting that he alone stood between the United States and creeping despotism. Yet when confronted with evidence that the worlds leading authoritarian regime had penetrated American election infrastructure, he did not level with the public or demand sweeping reforms to harden those systems.
At some point, the pretense of charity collapses under the weight of the facts. Democrats spent years insisting that the Russians had effectively delivered the 2016 election to Trump a claim that never withstood serious scrutiny and that narrative became central to their political identity and fundraising.
Preserving that storyline required downplaying or ignoring any evidence that might suggest a different, more complex reality about foreign interference, particularly if it implicated China rather than Russia. It also required maintaining the fiction that American elections are so secure that any questioning of their integrity is inherently dangerous, even when the questions are grounded in declassified intelligence.
Thus, almost nothing was said publicly about Chinese access to voter data in 2020, even though the intelligence community had documented that they did. The silence served the political interests of the Democratic Party, but it did nothing to reassure Americans that their leaders were taking the threat of foreign cyber?operations seriously.
Against this backdrop, the SAVE America Act already passed by the House and now facing an uncertain fate in the Democrat?controlled Senate represents at least a modest attempt to address glaring vulnerabilities in the system. While the legislation might not have directly prevented the specific Chinese operations described in the 2020 memo, it moves in the right direction by prioritizing election security and tightening safeguards around voter data and processes.
If election integrity were treated as a non?negotiable national priority rather than a partisan talking point, future administrations would be far less likely to bury or minimize revelations that a foreign adversary is probing or infiltrating U.S. election systems. Robust, transparent defenses would be a bipartisan expectation, not a conservative wish list.
Instead, the party now working overtime to block the SAVE America Act is the same party that insists there is nothing to see here when it comes to Chinese cyber?intrusions into American election infrastructure. That resistance speaks volumes about where Democrats priorities lie and it is not with fortifying the ballot box against hostile regimes.
For many on the right, this episode is yet more proof that Democrats function as a kind of political anti?compass: if one wants to find the path that protects American sovereignty, individual liberty, and constitutional self?government, one can often do so by heading in the exact opposite direction from where the left is pointing. As the debate over the SAVE America Act unfolds, the question is whether enough lawmakers will be willing to defy that misdirection and finally treat foreign interference including from Beijing as the grave threat it truly is.
Login