Mel Gibson, the Oscar-winning actor and director long targeted by the left for his unapologetic faith and traditional views, is once again at the center of a media firestorm as he works on a sequel to his landmark 2004 film The Passion of the Christ.
.
The new film, titled The Resurrection of the Christ, is currently being shot south of Rome, according to Western Journal, and the project has already drawn intense scrutiny from liberal outlets eager to manufacture controversy around it. This time, the catalyst is not the films subject matter, but a visitor to the set: excommunicated Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigan, a fierce critic of Pope Francis and a rare high-ranking churchman who has openly challenged the progressive drift within the Catholic Church.
Vigan posted photos Tuesday on his X account showing his visit to the set, including one image that appears to show him seated beside Gibson as the director worked. That single photograph was enough for some local outlets to speculate that Vigan had been brought in as a theological or spiritual consultant on the film, a claim that quickly ricocheted across social media and into the broader press.
Liberal entertainment magazine Variety eagerly amplified that narrative, asserting that its own sources had confirmed the reports that Vigan was consulting on the production. In its characteristically slanted description, Variety reminded readers that Vigan was excommunicated in 2024 for refusing to recognize Pope Francis authority and rejecting the Second Vatican Council that modernized the Roman Catholic Church. He has repeatedly referred to Francis as a liberal servant of Satan and a false prophet in public statements. Vigan is also known to be a big fan of U.S. President Donald Trump, a critic of gay rights, and a supporter of anti-vaccine positions.
That framing, heavy on ideological labels and light on context, fit neatly into a familiar media pattern: portray orthodox Catholics and conservative figures as dangerous extremists while ignoring the substance of their concerns. It also conveniently allowed critics of Gibson, already hostile to his bold depiction of Christs crucifixion two decades ago, to attack the sequel before a single frame has reached audiences.
By weeks end, however, that narrative began to unravel when TMZ reported that the consulting claims were simply not true. Citing movie insiders, TMZ stated unequivocally that Vigan was not serving in any official consulting role on the film and had merely requested a visit to the set and a conversation with Gibson.
Vigans interest in the project is hardly surprising, given his outspoken defense of traditional Catholic teaching and his willingness to challenge what many see as the politicization and liberalization of the Church under Pope Francis. Gibson, for his part, had previously defended Vigan following his excommunication in 2024, a stance that further endeared him to many conservative Catholics while enraging progressive commentators.
What remains beyond dispute is that The Passion of the Christ has endured as one of the most powerful and commercially successful faith-based films ever made, despite relentless criticism from secular and left-leaning voices. The Resurrection of the Christ, now slated for release in March 2027 and proceeding without Vigan in any official capacity, appears poised to provoke many of the same cultural and spiritual debates a prospect that clearly unnerves the media establishment but resonates deeply with believers who are hungry for unapologetically Christian storytelling in an increasingly hostile cultural climate.
Login