Pam Bondi Says Every Epstein Record Is OutNow Congress Wants Clinton Under Oath!

Written by Published

The long-running Jeffrey Epstein scandal has entered a new phase, with the Department of Justice now declaring that its court-ordered document release is complete and that every required record tied to the disgraced financier has been made public.

According to RedState, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Saturday that the department has finished releasing the Epstein files mandated under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a law passed by Congress to force long-suppressed information into the open. Bondis office touted the scale and scope of the disclosure, describing a massive document dump encompassing ALL 3.5 MILLION pages and stressing that redactions were permitted only to protect victims, not to shield the powerful from embarrassment or political fallout.

In a statement amplified on social media, Bondis team underscored that the release was designed to expose high-profile figures without fear or favor, declaring that HIGH-PROFILE names [were] EXPOSED with ZERO cover-ups for embarrassment or politics. The attorney generals office further emphasized that No records were withheld or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.

That assurance was repeated verbatim in Bondis formal correspondence to Capitol Hill, where she informed key lawmakers that the department had complied fully with the statute. In a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, Ranking Member Dick Durbin, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, and Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, Bondi wrote that "all" Epstein files have been released consistent with Section 3 of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

The letter elaborated on the breadth of the disclosure, explaining that the department had turned over every category of material specified by Congress. "In accordance with the requirements of the Act, and as described in various Department submissions to the courts of the Southern District of New York assigned to the Epstein and Maxwell prosecutions and related orders, the Department released all records, documents, communications and investigative materials in the possession of the Department that relate to any of nine different categories," the letter read.

Among the most explosive elements of the release is a list of more than 300 prominent names, a roster that spans politics, royalty, business, and entertainment. The letter notes that the list includes President Donald Trump, Barack and Michelle Obama, Prince Harry, Bill Gates, Woody Allen, Kim Kardashian, Kurt Cobain, Mark Zuckerberg and Bruce Springsteen, underscoring just how far Epsteins social web extended into elite circles.

Bondis letter again drove home the point that political sensitivities did not dictate what the public was allowed to see, reiterating the departments stance on transparency. The document states, "No records were withheld or redacted 'on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.'"

While the statutory requirement to release the files may now be satisfied, the political and cultural shockwaves are still building, as evidenced by fiery congressional hearings held Wednesday. During those proceedings, Bondi clashed with several Democratic members who aggressively questioned her over the timing and handling of the document release, turning the hearing into a partisan spectacle rather than a sober inquiry into institutional failures.

Outside Washington, the fallout has already claimed reputations and careers across the Atlantic and within elite academic and financial institutions. Former Harvard University President Larry Summers stepped back from public commitments in November, Prince Andrew has been stripped of his royal titles and evicted from his longtime residence, a Goldman Sachs chief legal officer resigned Thursday, and members of the UK government and various European figures are now entangled in the scandal, making Epsteins legacy the poisonous gift that keeps on giving.

Notably, one figure has emerged from the document deluge largely unscathed: President Donald Trump, whose enemies on the left had long hoped the files would implicate him more deeply. Instead, multiple powerful Democrats have been exposed while Trump has been, as conservatives now argue, VINDICATED, undercutting years of insinuations from liberal media and Democratic operatives.

The scrutiny is far from over for the Clinton political machine, which has long been dogged by questions about its ties to Epstein and his network. Former President Bill Clinton and former First Lady Hillary Clinton are still scheduled to testify later in February before the House Oversight Committee about what they knew of the late financiers activities, and Committee Chair James Comer (KY-01) has signaled he wants to call Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates afterward.

The Clintons have repeatedly tried to delay or reshape the terms of their appearance, with Comer at one point preparing to hold them in contempt of Congress, raising doubts about whether they will ultimately submit to robust questioning. Theyve consistently tried to change the parameters of the hearing; no doubt theyll have some last-minute trick up their sleeves, a dynamic that has only fueled conservative suspicions that key Democrats are desperate to keep certain details from public view.

For its part, the Department of Justice insists that its role under the Transparency Act is complete and that it has done precisely what Congress required. As far as the DOJ is concerned, however, they say they've done what Congress demanded, and theyre ready to move on, leaving lawmakersand the American publicto sift through the revelations and decide who, if anyone, will finally be held accountable.