Rep. Rashida Tlaib, the far-left Democrat from Michigan, is now the subject of a detailed warning over the potential risks her conduct and associations may pose to the integrity and security of the U.S. government.
According to WND, a new comprehensive briefing from the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy (ISGAP) scrutinizes Tlaibs political activities, rhetoric, and network of allies, alleging that her record raises serious ethical and national security concerns.
The document focuses on her ties to individuals and organizations linked to designated foreign terrorist entities, arguing that these connections are not incidental but part of a broader pattern of ideological alignment.
Through public endorsement, co-sponsorship, and amplification, Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib has consistently engaged with a range of organizations known to maintain operational or ideological ties to terrorist networks, the briefing states.
Tlaib has engaged with and disseminated the messaging of these groups and has shared related content on social media platforms, has participated in events organized by these groups, and has referenced their terminology and conceptual frameworks in official congressional communications.
The report contends that Tlaibs behavior goes beyond controversial speech and veers into territory that could compromise the ethical and institutional integrity of the United States government.
The conduct of Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, including her rhetoric, affiliations, campaign infrastructure, and ideological alignment with certain individuals and organizations, raises serious concerns about potential risks to the ethical and institutional integrity of the United States government, the document warns.
Investigators highlight what they describe as a recurring pattern of radical alignment, asserting that Tlaibs activities suggests an ideological affinity for radical movements, ranging from participation in conferences featuring convicted terrorists to significant campaign payments made to activists linked to Hamas and Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-aligned networks.
This pattern, they argue, is not merely symbolic but is reflected in concrete financial and political support structures surrounding the congresswoman.
One of the most striking examples cited is her campaign apparatus, which has reportedly funneled nearly $600,000 to Unbought Power, a consulting firm operated by Rasha Mubarak.
Mubarak is suspected of involvement with the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an organization named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2009 Holy Land Foundation terror-financing case, raising red flags about the judgment and priorities of a sitting member of Congress.
The briefing also notes that Tlaib has shared a stage with an individual who publicly characterized the October 7 Hamas massacre of Israeli civilians as resistance.
For many Americans, especially those who prioritize national security and stand firmly with Israel, such associations underscore a troubling moral and political disconnect between Tlaib and mainstream U.S. values.
The House of Representatives has already been forced to confront Tlaibs conduct on multiple occasions, reflecting bipartisan discomfort with her rhetoric and alliances.
She was formally censured in 2023 for promoting alleged false narratives about the Hamas terror attack on Israel, and her name resurfaced in 2025 after she appeared at the Peoples Conference for Palestine, where, according to the report, the agenda included whitewashing convicted Hamas financiers.
In response to these mounting concerns, the ISGAP briefing urges Congress to launch a full investigation into Tlaibs activities, including her public statements that appear to echo or legitimize terrorist narratives.
The proposed inquiry would also examine her participation in events organized by extremist-linked groups and the broader ecosystem of activists and organizations that intersect with her political operation.
The report further stresses the need for federal law enforcement to evaluate whether any legal lines have been crossed in Tlaibs dealings.
It noted, Additionally, the briefing asks the Department of Justices National Security Division to conduct a legal review to determine if Tlaib or her affiliates have violated 18 U.S. Code 2339B, which prohibits providing material support to foreign terrorist organizations.
Financial scrutiny is a central component of the recommended response, with investigators calling for a thorough review of the money Tlaib has accepted and disbursed.
They argue that campaign contributions and consulting payments should be examined to determine whether any funds originated from, or were directed to, individuals or entities tied to terrorism, a step many conservatives would see as the bare minimum for safeguarding Congress from foreign-influenced radicalism.
As the debate over Tlaibs conduct intensifies, the case underscores a broader question about how far ideological extremism can be allowed to penetrate American institutions before decisive action is taken.
For those who believe in a strong national defense, unwavering support for U.S. allies like Israel, and strict enforcement of anti-terror laws, the allegations outlined in this briefing will likely fuel renewed calls for accountability, transparency, and a higher ethical standard for those entrusted with public office.
Login